Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123457›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Revisiting Querleu-Morrow Radical Hysterectomy: How to Apply the Anatomy of Parametrium and Pelvic Autonomic Nerves to Cervical Cancer Surgery?

Stoyan Kostov, Yavor Kornovski, Rafał Watrowski, Angel Yordanov, Stanislav Slavchev, Yonka Ivanova, Hakan Yalcin, Ivan Ivanov, Ilker Selcuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stoyan KostovResearch Institute, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-3095
Yavor KornovskiDepartment of Gynecology, Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Rafał WatrowskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helios Hospital Müllheim, 79379 Müllheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6828-1887
Angel YordanovDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-7719-382X
Stanislav SlavchevDepartment of Gynecology, Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-4830-6159
Yonka IvanovaDepartment of Gynecology, Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Hakan YalcinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Maternity Hospital, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
Ivan IvanovDepartment of General and Clinical Pathology, University Hospital "Dr. Georgi Stranski", 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Ilker SelcukDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Maternity Hospital, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0499-5722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2008, Querleu and Morrow proposed a novel classification of radical hysterectomy, which was quickly accepted by the professional oncogynecological community. The Querleu and Morrow (Q-M) classification of radical hysterectomy has provided a unique opportunity for uniform surgical and anatomical terminology. The classification offers detailed explanations of anatomical landmarks and resection margins for the three parametria of the uterus. However, there are still some disagreements and misconceptions regarding the terminology and anatomical landmarks of the Q-M classification. This article aims to highlight the surgical anatomy of all radical hysterectomy types within the Q-M classification. It discusses and illustrates the importance of anatomical landmarks for defining resection margins of the Q-M classification and reviews the differences between Q-M and other radical hysterectomy classifications. Additionally, we propose an update of the Q-M classification, which includes the implementation of parauterine lymphovascular tissue, paracervical lymph node dissection, and Selective-Systematic Nerve-Sparing type C2 radical hysterectomy. Type D was modified according to current guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. The detailed explanation of the surgical anatomy of radical hysterectomy and the proposed update may help achieve surgical harmonization and precise standardization among oncogynecologists, which can further facilitate accurate and comparable results of multi-institutional surgical clinical trials.

Indexed as

cervical cancer surgerynerve-sparing hysterectomyparametriumQuerleu and Morrow classificationradical hysterectomysurgical anatomy

Identifiers

PMID39123457
PMCPMC11312287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.