In Silico Comparison of Three Different Beam Arrangements for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Postoperative Whole Pelvic Irradiation of Prostate Cancer.

Emile Gogineni, Hao Chen, Ian K Cruickshank, Andrew Koempel, Aarush Gogineni, Heng Li, Curtiland Deville

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Omission of lateral isocenter shifts in robust optimization of proton therapy treatment plans for prostate cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emile GogineniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6222-311X

Hao ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Ian K CruickshankDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Andrew KoempelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Aarush GogineniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Heng LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Curtiland DevilleDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-6486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

beam arrangementdosimetricdosimetryIMPTintensity-modulated proton therapypelvicpencil beamprostate cancerprotonradiation therapyscanning beamwhole pelvis

Identifiers

PMID39123430

DOI10.3390/cancers16152702

PMCPMC11311848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.