Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123397›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Can Delta Radiomics Improve the Prediction of Best Overall Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival of Melanoma Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors?

Felix Peisen, Annika Gerken, Alessa Hering, Isabel Dahm, Konstantin Nikolaou, Sergios Gatidis, Thomas K Eigentler, Teresa Amaral, Jan H Moltz, Ahmed E Othman

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CT radiomics showed no improvement beyond volume dynamics for early lesion-level size response to immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Prognostic Biomarkers in Evolving Melanoma Immunotherapy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Felix PeisenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4800-8381
Annika GerkenFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Alessa HeringFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Isabel DahmDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Konstantin NikolaouDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-7325
Sergios GatidisDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Thomas K EigentlerCenter of Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0019-2770
Teresa AmaralCenter of Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-5181
Jan H MoltzFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7880-1014
Ahmed E OthmanInstitute of Neuroradiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 428216905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of metastatic melanoma is increasing, necessitating the identification of patients who do not benefit from immunotherapy. This study aimed to develop a radiomic biomarker based on the segmentation of all metastases at baseline and the first follow-up CT for the endpoints best overall response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), encompassing various immunotherapies. Additionally, this study investigated whether reducing the number of segmented metastases per patient affects predictive capacity.

methodsThe total tumour load, excluding cerebral metastases, from 146 baseline and 146 first follow-up CTs of melanoma patients treated with first-line immunotherapy was volumetrically segmented. Twenty-one random forest models were trained and compared for the endpoints BOR; PFS at 6, 9, and 12 months; and OS at 6, 9, and 12 months, using as input either only clinical parameters, whole-tumour-load delta radiomics plus clinical parameters, or delta radiomics from the largest ten metastases plus clinical parameters.

resultsThe whole-tumour-load delta radiomics model performed best for BOR (AUC 0.81); PFS at 6, 9, and 12 months (AUC 0.82, 0.80, and 0.77); and OS at 6 months (AUC 0.74). The model using delta radiomics from the largest ten metastases performed best for OS at 9 and 12 months (AUC 0.71 and 0.75). Although the radiomic models were numerically superior to the clinical model, statistical significance was not reached.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that delta radiomics may offer additional value for predicting BOR, PFS, and OS in metastatic melanoma patients undergoing first-line immunotherapy. Despite its complexity, volumetric whole-tumour-load segmentation could be advantageous.

Indexed as

delta radiomicsimmunotherapymelanomapredictionresponsesurvivaltotal tumour burdenvolumetric segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39123397
PMCPMC11312160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.