Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123376›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Resistant Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin and the Impact of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Dysgeusia on Overall Survival: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.

Keita Nakane, Kazuki Taniguchi, Minori Nezasa, Torai Enomoto, Toyohiro Yamada, Risa Tomioka-Inagawa, Kojiro Niwa, Masayuki Tomioka, Takashi Ishida, Shingo Nagai and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Efficacy and Safety of Enfortumab Vedotin by Trial Eligibility in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Keita NakaneDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2589-1722
Kazuki TaniguchiDepartment of Urology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu 5008717, Japan.
Minori NezasaDepartment of Urology, Matsunami General Hospital, Gifu 5016062, Japan.
Torai EnomotoDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Toyohiro YamadaDepartment of Urology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki 5038502, Japan.
Risa Tomioka-InagawaDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Takayama Hospital, Takayama 5068550, Japan.
Kojiro NiwaDepartment of Urology, Daiyukai Daiichi Hospital, Ichinomiya 4918551, Japan.
Masayuki TomiokaDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Takashi IshidaDepartment of Urology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu 5008513, Japan.
Shingo NagaiDepartment of Urology, Toyota Memorial Hospital, Toyota 4718513, Japan.
Shigeaki YokoiDepartment of Urology, Central Japan International Medical Center, Minokamo 5058510, Japan.
Tomoki TaniguchiDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2612-2191
Makoto KawaseDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-2462
Kota KawaseDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Koji IinumaDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Yuki TobisawaDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Takuya KoieDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2980-127X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomized phase III trial results have demonstrated enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of an anti-Nectin-4 human IgG1 monoclonal antibody and monomethyl auristatin E, is a useful treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to identify predictive factors for the efficacy of EV therapy and prolonged overall survival (OS) of patients in clinical practice. This study included patients with la/mUC who received ICI treatment. Patients who subsequently received EV treatment, those who received non-EV chemotherapy, and those who received no treatment were defined as EV, non-EV, and best supportive care (BSC) groups, respectively. The median OS was 20, 15, and 7 months in the EV, non-EV, and BSC groups, respectively (

Indexed as

advanced urothelial carcinomadysgeusiaenfortumab vedotinneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratiooverall survivalprognostic factorretrospective multicenter cohort study

Identifiers

PMID39123376
PMCPMC11312170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.