ReviewCancers2024
The Safety and Usefulness of Awake Surgery as a Treatment Modality for Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of awake craniotomy versus general anesthesia for glioma resection: A systematic review.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Awake surgery contributes to the maximal safe removal of gliomas by localizing brain function. However, the efficacy and safety thereof as a treatment modality for glioblastomas (GBMs) have not yet been established. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of awake surgery as a treatment modality for GBMs, response to awake mapping, and the factors correlated with mapping failure. Patients with GBMs who had undergone awake surgery at our hospital between March 2010 and February 2023 were included in this study. Those with recurrence were excluded from this study. The clinical characteristics, response to awake mapping, extent of resection (EOR), postoperative complications, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and factors correlated with mapping failure were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 32 participants included in this study, the median age was 57 years old; 17 (53%) were male. Awake mapping was successfully completed in 28 participants (88%). A positive response to mapping and limited resection were observed in 17 (53%) and 13 participants (41%), respectively. The EOR included gross total, subtotal, and partial resections and biopsies in 19 (59%), 8 (25%), 3 (9%), and 2 cases (6%), respectively. Eight (25%) and three participants (9%) presented with neurological deterioration in the acute postoperative period and at 3 months postoperatively, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 15.7 and 36.9 months, respectively. The time from anesthetic induction to extubation was statistically significantly longer in the mapping failure cohort than that in the mapping success cohort. Functional areas could be detected during awake surgery in participants with GBMs. Thus, awake mapping influences intraoperative discernment, contributes to the preservation of brain function, and improves treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.