Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123273›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

Identifying the essential elements to inform the development of a research agenda for Paramedicine in Ireland: a Delphi Study.

Kelly-Ann Bowles, Alan M Batt, Michelle O'Toole, Shane Knox, Liam Hemingway, Julia Williams, Brett Williams, Niamh M Cummins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelly-Ann BowlesDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. kelly-ann.bowles@monash.edu.
Alan M BattDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle O'TooleDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Shane KnoxNational Ambulance Service, Dublin, Ireland.
Liam HemingwayDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Julia WilliamsSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Brett WilliamsDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Niamh M CumminsDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParamedicine is a dynamic profession which has evolved from a "treat and transport" service into a complex network of health professionals working in a diverse range of clinical roles. Research is challenging in the paramedicine context, and internationally, research capacity and culture has developed slowly. International examples of research agendas and strategies in paramedicine exist, however, research priorities have not previously been identified in Ireland.

methodsThis study was a three round electronic modified Delphi design which aimed to establish the key aspects of the research priorities via end-user consensus. Participants included interested stakeholders involved in prehospital care or research in Ireland. The first round questionnaire consisted of open-ended questions with results coded and developed into themes for the closed-ended questions used in the second and third round questionnaires. A consensus level of 70% was set a priori for second and third rounds.

resultsResearch Priorities that reached consensus included Staff Wellbeing, Education and Professionalism and Acute Medical Conditions. Respondents indicated that these three areas should be a priority in the next 2 years. Education, Staffing and Leadership were imperative Key Resources that required change. Education was a Key Processes change deemed imperative to allow the future research to occur. Outcomes that should be included in the future research strategy were Patient Outcomes, Practitioner Development, Practitioner Wellbeing, Alternate Pathways, Evidence-based Practice and Staff Satisfaction.

conclusionThe results of this study are similar to previously published international studies, with some key differences. There was a greater emphasis on Education and Practitioner Wellbeing with the latter possibly attributed to the timing of the research in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. The disseminated findings of this study should inform sustainable funding models to aid the development of paramedicine research in Ireland.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueParamedicineAllied Health PersonnelConsensusCOVID-19Emergency Medical ServicesEvidence-Based PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansIrelandLeadershipProfessionalismResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesDelphiIrelandParamedicineResearch priorities

Identifiers

PMID39123273
PMCPMC11313103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.