Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123254›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

Knockdown resistance mutations in Phlebotomus argentipes sand flies in Bihar, India.

Mojca Kristan, Carlamarita Hazelgrove, Kundan Kumar, Ashish Kumar, Vijay Kumar, Pradeep Das, Emma Collins, Miguella Mark-Carew, Susana Campino, Mary Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mojca KristanDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. mojca.kristan@lshtm.ac.uk.
Carlamarita HazelgroveDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kundan KumarRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Ashish KumarRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Vijay KumarRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Pradeep DasDepartment of Molecular Parasitology, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Emma CollinsDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Miguella Mark-CarewDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Susana CampinoDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mary CameronDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1183986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVector control based on indoor residual spraying (IRS) is one of the main components of the visceral leishmaniasis (VL) elimination programme in India. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) was used for IRS until 2015 and was later replaced by the synthetic pyrethroid alpha-cypermethrin. Both classes of insecticides share the same target site, the voltage-gated sodium channel (Vgsc). As high levels of resistance to DDT have been documented in the local sand fly vector, Phlebotomus argentipes, it is possible that mutations in the Vgsc gene could provide resistance to alpha-cypermethrin, affecting current IRS pyrethroid-based vector control.

methodsThis study aimed to compare frequencies of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Vgsc between two sprayed and two unsprayed villages in Bihar state, India, which had the highest VL burden of the four endemic states. Across four villages, 350 female P. argentipes were collected as part of a 2019 molecular xenomonitoring study. DNA was extracted and used for sequence analysis of the IIS6 fragment of the Vgsc gene to assess the presence of kdr mutations.

resultsMutations were identified at various positions, most frequently at codon 1014, a common site known to be associated with insecticide resistance in mosquitoes and sand flies. Significant inter-village variation was observed, with sand flies from Dharampur, an unsprayed village, showing a significantly higher proportion of wild-type alleles (55.8%) compared with the three other villages (8.5-14.3%). The allele differences observed across the four villages may result from selection pressure caused by previous exposure to DDT.

conclusionsWhile DDT resistance has been reported in Bihar, P. argentipes is still susceptible to pyrethroids. However, the presence of kdr mutations in sand flies could present a threat to IRS used for VL control in endemic villages in India. Continuous surveillance of vector bionomics and insecticide resistance, using bioassays and target genotyping, is required to inform India's vector control strategies and to ensure the VL elimination target is reached and sustained.

Indexed as

Insecticide ResistanceInsecticidesLeishmaniasis, VisceralMutationPhlebotomusPyrethrinsAnimalsDDTFemaleIndiaInsect ProteinsInsect VectorsVoltage-Gated Sodium ChannelscypermethrinDDTInsecticidesInsect ProteinsPyrethrinsVoltage-Gated Sodium ChannelsInsecticide resistancekdr mutationsPhlebotomus argentipesVector surveillanceVisceral leishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID39123254
PMCPMC11311910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.