Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123242›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2024

Barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production with Autistic people with an eating disorder.

Emy Nimbley, Ellen Maloney, Kyle Buchan, Michelle Sader, Karri Gillespie-Smith, Fiona Duffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emy NimbleyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Ellen MaloneyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Kyle BuchanDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Michelle SaderEating Disorders and Autism Collaborative (EDAC), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Karri Gillespie-SmithDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Fiona DuffyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK. fiona.duffy@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

MRF MR/X03058X/1National Institute for Health and Care Research MR/X03058X/1UK Research and Innovation MR/X03058X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-production is the collaboration between researchers and the lived experience community in designing, conducting and sharing research. The importance of co-production is increasingly advocated in both the autism and eating disorder fields. Despite this, there remains a lack of clarity at how to define, apply and conduct ethical co-production. Understanding common challenges and what we can do to overcome these challenges are integral to ensuring ethical and meaningful research with Autistic people with an eating disorder. The current study therefore explored: What are the barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production with Autistic people with an ED?

methodsFive workshops were conducted with 30 collaborators exploring barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production. Synchronous (online workshops) and asynchronous (offline discussion forum) data was analysed using thematic analysis. Themes were co-produced by a neurotypical and Autistic researcher with lived/living experience of an eating disorder.

resultsFour themes were identified that explored barriers to ethical co-production: unequal partnerships, the inaccessibility of research, excluded by diagnoses and communication differences. Three themes were identified with regards to facilitators of ethical co-production: shared power (with sub-themes relationships, not roles and creative compensation), clarity and transparency and autism-affirming approaches. DISCUSSION: Conducting ethical co-production with Autistic people with eating disorders has the potential to generate meaningful research that can be translated into improving the lives of the Autistic and eating disorder community. To achieve this, co-production teams should strive towards shared power and long-term relationships, adapting for communication differences and preferences and operating firmly within an autism-affirming framework. It is hoped that study findings will inspire collaboration, discussion and novel, translatable research.

Identifiers

PMID39123242
PMCPMC11312805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.