Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123186›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Preliminary findings on the experiences of care for women who suffered early pregnancy losses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

Sergio A Silverio, Rhiannon George-Carey, Maria Memtsa, Flora E Kent-Nye, Laura A Magee, Kayleigh S Sheen, Karen Burgess, Munira Oza, Claire Storey, Jane Sandall and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sergio A SilverioDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. Sergio.Silverio@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-3471
Rhiannon George-CareyGynaecology Services, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7681-9905
Maria MemtsaGynaecology Service, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-0800
Flora E Kent-NyeDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-9470
Laura A MageeDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-610X
Kayleigh S SheenDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1254-1763
Karen Burgess *Petals: The Baby Loss Counselling Charity, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6256-116X
Munira Oza *The Ectopic Pregnancy Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2180-7896
Claire StoreyPatient and Public Involvement and Engagement Group for Perinatal Bereavement, Trauma, & Loss, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-9909
Jane SandallDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-743X
PUDDLES UK Collaboration
Abigail EasterDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6537
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-3070
Davor JurkovićGynaecology Diagnostic and Treatment Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-5736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen who suffer an early pregnancy loss require specific clinical care, aftercare, and ongoing support. In the UK, the clinical management of early pregnancy complications, including loss is provided mainly through specialist Early Pregnancy Assessment Units. The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally changed the way in which maternity and gynaecological care was delivered, as health systems moved to rapidly reconfigure and re-organise services, aiming to reduce the risk and spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. PUDDLES is an international collaboration investigating the pandemic's impact on care for people who suffered a perinatal bereavement. Presented here are initial qualitative findings undertaken with UK-based women who suffered early pregnancy losses during the pandemic, about how they navigated the healthcare system and its restrictions, and how they were supported.

methodsIn-keeping with a qualitative research design, in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with an opportunity sample of women (N = 32) who suffered any early pregnancy loss during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analysed using a template analysis to understand women's access to services, care, and networks of support, during the pandemic following their pregnancy loss. The thematic template was based on findings from parents who had suffered a late-miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death in the UK, during the pandemic.

resultsAll women had experienced reconfigured maternity and early pregnancy services. Data supported themes of: 1) COVID-19 Restrictions as Impractical & Impersonal; 2) Alone, with Only Staff to Support Them; 3) Reduction in Service Provision Leading to Perceived Devaluation in Care; and 4) Seeking Their Own Support. Results suggest access to early pregnancy loss services was reduced and pandemic-related restrictions were often impractical (i.e., restrictions added to burden of accessing or receiving care). Women often reported being isolated and, concerningly, aspects of early pregnancy loss services were reported as sub-optimal.

conclusionsThese findings provide important insight for the recovery and rebuilding of health services in the post-pandemic period and help us prepare for providing a higher standard of care in the future and through any other health system shocks. Conclusions made can inform future policy and planning to ensure best possible support for women who experience early pregnancy loss.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousCOVID-19Qualitative ResearchAdultBereavementFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaternal Health ServicesPregnancySARS-CoV-2United KingdomYoung AdultAbortionCOVID-19Early pregnancyEctopic pregnancyMiscarriageMolar pregnancyPregnancy lossPregnancy of unknown locationQualitative researchSARS-CoV-2Termination of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39123186
PMCPMC11312198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.