Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123158›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Multi-dimensional comparison of abdominal obesity indices and insulin resistance indicators for assessing NAFLD.

Jiejun Shi, Jianhua Chen, Zeqin Zhang, Guoqing Qian

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiejun ShiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China. 804175955@qq.com.
Jianhua ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zeqin ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Guoqing QianDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China. bill.qian@outlook.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo Municipality No. 202003N4019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) keeps increasing annually worldwide. Non-invasive assessment tools for evaluating the risk and severity of the disease are still limited. Insulin resistance (IR) and abdominal obesity (ABO) are closely related to NAFLD.

methodsA retrospective large-scale, population-based study was conducted based on the data from the 2017-2018 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Three ABO indices, namely lipid accumulation product (LAP), visceral obesity index (VAI), waist circumference-triglyceride index (WTI), and three IR indices, including triglyceride glucose index (TyG), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR), were analyzed and compared for their relationships with NAFLD based on weighted multivariable logistic regression, spearman correlation heatmap, smooth curve fittings. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic capability of these indices for NAFLD. Differences among the AUCs were calculated and compared by Delong test.

resultsIn total, 3095 participants were included in our study among which 1368 adults were diagnosed with NAFLD. All six indices presented positive associations with NAFLD. There was a claw-shaped curve between HOMA-IR, VAI, LAP and NAFLD while a smooth semi-bell curve was observed in TyG, METS-IR and WTI. LAP and HOMA-IR had the best diagnostic capability for NAFLD (LAP: AUC = 0.8, Youden index = 0.48; HOMA-IR: AUC = 0.798, Youden index = 0.472) while VAI (AUC = 0.728, Youden index = 0.361) showed the lowest predictive value. The correlation heat map indicated positive correlations between all six indices and liver function, hepatic steatosis and fibrosis severity. In the NAFLD group, IR indicators presented a stronger association with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) compared with ABO indices.

conclusionsAll six indices can screen NAFLD withLAP and HOMA-IR being possibly optimal predictors. IR indices may be more sensitive to identify acute hepatic injury in NAFLD patients than ABO indices.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseNutrition SurveysObesity, AbdominalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTriglyceridesWaist CircumferenceTriglyceridesAbdominal obesityAlanine aminotransferaseInsulin resistanceNAFLDNHANES

Identifiers

PMID39123158
PMCPMC11311916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.