ArticleBMC oral health2024
Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the detection of peri-implant fenestration.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are the detection and dimensions of peri-implant buccal bone defects influenced by different implant materials and their location? An experimental cone-beam computed tomography study.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Analysis of prosthetic outcomes and influencing factors in patients with alveolar bone atrophy.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Detection and Classification of Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Using a Deep Learning Approach.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Effect of CBCT voxel size and software program on the detection of fenestrations and dehiscences.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Accuracy of bone height and thickness measurements in cone beam computed tomography using different voxel sizes in maxilla and mandible.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate assessment of the bone supporting the implant is crucial. Early detection of bone defects around the implant can prevent the loss of bone support that ultimately leads to the loss of the implant. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to check the accuracy of CBCT in detecting peri-implant fenestrations around the implant. MATERIALS &
methodsIn this laboratory study, healthy beef ribs were used. The ribs were divided into three groups of 12 (control group, 1-2 mm fenestration group, and 2-3 mm fenestration group). The blocks were cut to a length of 20 mm and 36 osteotomies with dimensions of 4 × 12 mm were made by the periodontist in order to place the implant in these bone blocks. Then the titanium implant was placed in the holes and the initial scan was performed with CBCT. In the second group, fenestration-like lesions were created on the same buccal side at a distance of 10 mm from the crest with a diameter of 1-2 mm and in the third group with a diameter of 2-3 mm, and the CBCT scan was performed again with the same parameters. Two radiologists evaluated the images twice for the presence and absence of fenestration.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between direct measurements and CBCT in the fenestration group of 1-2 mm (p < 0.05), but there was a significant difference between direct measurements and CBCT in the fenestration group of 2-3 mm and underestimation was observed in CBCT measurements.
conclusionThe findings of this study showed that CBCT radiography has a higher accuracy in measuring the fenestration around the implant with a smaller diameter and has an acceptable diagnostic value in detecting bone loss around the implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.