Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123146›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2024

Differential response to preoperative exercise training in patients candidates to cardiac valve replacement.

Antonio López-Hernández, Elena Gimeno-Santos, Ricard Navarro-Ripoll, María José Arguis, Bárbara Romano-Andrioni, Manuel López-Baamonde, Silvia Teres, María Sanz-de la Garza, Graciela Martinez-Palli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03466606 (Implementation of a Trimodal Prehabilitation Program as a Preoperative Optimization Strategy in Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03466606 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation of a Trimodal Prehabilitation Program as a Preoperative Optimization Strategy in Cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Valvular Heart DiseaseArmspre-habilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antonio López-Hernández *Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena Gimeno-Santos *Prehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ricard Navarro-RipollAnesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María José ArguisAnesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Bárbara Romano-AndrioniPrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel López-BaamondeAnesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia TeresPrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María Sanz-de la GarzaAugust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Graciela Martinez-PalliAnesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. GMARTIN@clinic.cat.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI17/00852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is lack of evidence regarding safety, effectiveness and applicability of prehabilitation on cardiac surgery population, particularly in patients candidates to cardiac valve replacement. The aim of the study is to assess and compare the effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on functional capacity in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AoS) and severe mitral regurgitation (MR) proposed for valve replacement surgery.

methodsSecondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial whose main objective was to analyze the efficacy of a 4-6 weeks multimodal prehabilitation program in cardiac surgery on reducing postoperative complications. For this secondary analysis, only candidates for valve replacement surgery were selected. The primary outcome was the change in endurance time (ET) from baseline to preoperative assessment measured by a cycling constant work-rate cardiopulmonary exercise test.

results68 patients were included in this secondary analysis, 34 (20 AoS and 14 MR) were allocated to the prehabilitation group and 34 (20 AoS and 14 MR) to control group. At baseline, patients with AoS had better left systolic ventricular function and lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation compared to MR (p = 0.022 and p = 0.035 respectively). After prehabilitation program, patients with MR showed greater improvement in ET than AoS patients (101% vs. 66% increase from baseline). No adverse events related to the prehabilitation program were observed.

conclusionsA 4-6 week exercise training program is safe and overall improves functional capacity in patients with severe AoS and MR. However, exercise response is different according to the cardiac valve type disfunction, and further studies are needed to know the factors that predispose some patients to have better training response.

trial registrationThe study has been registered on the Registry of National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03466606) (05/03/2018).

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationMitral Valve InsufficiencyPreoperative ExerciseAgedExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareCardiac surgeryComplicationsExercise trainingFunctional capacityMultimodal prehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39123146
PMCPMC11311913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.