Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123132›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2024

Efficacy and safety of hydromorphone for cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohammadreza Alinejadfard, Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Ida Mohammadi, Soroush Oraee, Hossein Golsorkh, Sajjad Mahdavi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammadreza AlinejadfardSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Koodakyar Street, Tehran, Iran. mhmmdrzlnjd12@gmail.com.
Shahryar Rajai FirouzabadiSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Koodakyar Street, Tehran, Iran.
Ida MohammadiSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Koodakyar Street, Tehran, Iran.
Soroush OraeeSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Koodakyar Street, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein GolsorkhSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Koodakyar Street, Tehran, Iran.
Sajjad MahdaviSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Koodakyar Street, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer pain significantly impacts individuals' quality of life, with opioids being employed as the primary means for pain relief. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding the adverse reactions and effectiveness of opioids such as morphine. Hydromorphone, recognized as a potent opioid, is a viable alternative for managing cancer-related pain. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness and safety characteristics of hydromorphone in comparison to other opioids, as well as different methods of administering this medication within the scope of cancer pain treatment.

methodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on December 25th, 2023. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic investigation of databases was carried out, and suitable studies were chosen according to predetermined criteria (PICO framework). The meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

resultsThis review included 18 RCTs with 2271 patients who compared hydromorphone with morphine, oxycodone, or fentanyl, as well as other types of hydromorphone. Hydromorphone demonstrated efficacy similar to that of morphine and oxycodone in reducing cancer pain intensity, decreasing additional analgesic consumption, and improving quality of life. However, morphine showed slight superiority over hydromorphone in reducing breakthrough pain. Adverse events were comparable between hydromorphone and morphine or oxycodone. Patient-controlled and clinician-controlled hydromorphone administration routes yielded similar outcomes.

conclusionsThe outcomes of this study substantiate the efficacy of hydromorphone in the management of cancer-related pain, demonstrating similar levels of effectiveness and safety as morphine and oxycodone. These findings are consistent with prior comprehensive analyses, suggesting that hydromorphone is a feasible choice for alleviating cancer-associated pain. Additional investigations are warranted to determine its efficacy in distinct patient cohorts and for different modes of administration.

trial registrationProspero registration ID: CRD42024517513. Link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails .

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCancer PainHydromorphoneHumansNeoplasmsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidHydromorphoneAdverse eventsAnalgesicsBreakthrough painCancer painHydromorphoneOpioids

Identifiers

PMID39123132
PMCPMC11312680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.