ReviewNeurosurgical review2024
Minimally invasive tubular removal of spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma - a case series of 49 patients and review of the literature.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chiral cerium doped nanoreactor-mediated bladder carcinoma reinforced ablationMaterials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Occult residual disease after presumed gross-total resection of a predominantly intramuscular paraspinal lumbar schwannoma: a case report introducing the VERIFY-GTR end-of-resection bundle.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Intraneural Hemangioma: A Report of Two Cases.Cureus · 2026Article
- Unraveling a Hidden Mass: A 10-Year Mystery of Groin Swelling Reveals an Unexpected Diagnosis of Neurofibroma.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Resection of a giant paravertebral retroperitoneal schwannoma via the weaver approach: a case report on technical refinements and surgical considerations.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive tubular resection of spinal arachnoid webs.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Refining the far-lateral pathway: ten-year outcomes of posterolateral transforaminal resection of spinal tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Microscopic Minimal Invasive Resection of Spinal Tumor with Tubular Retractor System: Case Studies of 70 Patients with Literature Review.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Extended length of stay in open versus minimally invasive surgery with robotic-assisted sub-analysis for spinal nerve sheath tumor resection: a nationwide analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Precise localization value of lumbar lamina and ligamentum flavum boundaries in minimally invasive tubular resection of intraspinal schwannomas.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive tubular removal of spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma. In this single-centre study, we retrospectively analysed 49 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive removal of a total of 51 benign spinal nerve sheath tumors using a non-expandable (n = 18) or expandable tubular retractor (n = 33) retractor system between June 2007 and December 2019. The extent of resection, surgical complications, neurological outcome, operative time, and estimated blood loss were recorded. Histopathology revealed 41 schwannomas and 10 neurofibromas. After a mean follow-up of 30.8 months, postoperative MRI showed gross total resection in 93.7%, and subtotal resection in 6.3% of the tumors. Three patients were lost to follow up. Of the subtotal resections, one was a schwannoma (2.4% subtotal resections in schwannomas) and two were neurofibromas (20.0% subtotal resections in neurofibromas). Intraspinal and paraspinal tumor localizations were equally accessible by minimally invasive tubular surgery. Conversion to open surgery was not required in any case. The mean operative time was 167 ± 68 min, and estimated blood loss was 138 ± 145 ml. We observed no major surgical complications. Spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma can be removed effectively and safely using a minimally invasive tubular approach, with satisfying extent of tumor resection comparable to the conventional open surgical technique and no increased risk for neurological deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.