Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123085›Full record

Observational studyHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

Evaluating EHS parastomal hernia classification for surgical planning: a retrospective analysis of 160 consecutive cases in a single center.

Marek Szczepkowski, Mateusz Zamkowski, Suwała Alicja, Witkowski Piotr, Maciej Śmietański

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07064694 (Hybrid Parastomal Endoscopic Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07064694 completednot on this map

Hybrid Parastomal Endoscopic Repair (HyPER): Ten-Year Experience and Lessons Learned From a Single-Center Cohort of 200 Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorSwissmed HospitalRan2013 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsParastomal HerniaArmsHybrid Parastomal Endoscopic Repair (HyPER)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for parastomal hernia using the ePauli technique.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Parastomal hernia repair using retromuscular 3D funnel mesh: the "Sugar Funnel" technique.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marek SzczepkowskiClinical Department of Colorectal, General and Oncological Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Bielanski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz ZamkowskiSwissmed Hospital, Department of General Surgery and Hernia Center, Wileńska 44, Gdańsk, 80- 215, Poland. zamek@wp.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-9847-4188
Suwała AlicjaClinical Department of Colorectal, General and Oncological Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Bielanski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Witkowski PiotrClinical Department of Colorectal, General and Oncological Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Bielanski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej ŚmietańskiSwissmed Hospital, Department of General Surgery and Hernia Center, Wileńska 44, Gdańsk, 80- 215, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParastomal hernia (PH) is a prevalent complication following ostomy formation, presenting significant challenges in surgical management. This study aims to validate the European Hernia Society classification for PH through the application of the Hybrid Parastomal Endoscopic Repair (HyPER) method. The study focuses on establishing the practical utility of the European Hernia Society classification in a clinical setting, particularly in guiding surgical approaches and improving patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective observational study aimed to assess the utility of the European Hernia Society classification in planning surgical strategies for parastomal hernias. The validation of the classification of PH was based on the experience involving 160 patients in single center. Patients were classified according to the European Hernia Society criteria, and data were collected on patient demographics, clinical presentations, and surgical outcomes. Main goal was to assess the consistency and applicability of the European Hernia Society classification in predicting surgical challenges and outcomes.

resultsThe study found a predominance of complex Type III and IV hernias. The European Hernia Society classification was effective in categorizing PH, aiding in surgical planning and highlighting the increased complication rates associated with more complex hernia types. This study represents the largest single-center cohort treated for PH by a single team, providing a controlled evaluation of the HyPER technique's effectiveness.

conclusionsThe validation of the European Hernia Society classification in this study is a significant advancement in the standardization of PH management. The findings demonstrate the classification's utility in enhancing surgical planning and patient-centered care. The study also opens avenues for further research into standardized approaches and techniques in PH treatment.

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEndoscopyFemaleHernia, VentralHumansIncisional HerniaMaleMiddle AgedOstomyRetrospective StudiesSurgical StomasAbdominal wallHerniaHernioplastyHyPER, parastomal hernia

Identifiers

PMID39123085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.