ArticleDermatology and therapy2024
Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Maintain Stable Response with No or Minimal Fluctuations with 1 Year of Lebrikizumab Treatment.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes and Predictors of Sustained Response After Dose Tapering of Targeted Therapies in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Memory Cells in Atopic Dermatitis: Paving the Way to Disease Modification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Efficacy of Lebrikizumab on Pruritus: A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Anchored Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Long-Term Maintenance of Efficacy of Tralokinumab and Lebrikizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Lebrikizumab: A 16-Week Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Two-Year Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Long-Term Extension (ADjoin).Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLebrikizumab is a novel monoclonal antibody with established efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in multiple Phase 3 trials. One of the ultimate treatment goals for patients with moderate-to-severe AD is to achieve stable disease control without concern for planning future life events.
methodsIn ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, lebrikizumab-treated patients meeting the protocol-defined response criteria at Week 16 were re-randomized 2:2:1 to receive lebrikizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W), lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W), or placebo Q2W (lebrikizumab withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated the proportions of patients with no or minimal fluctuations of efficacy during the 36-week maintenance period and plotted individual patient trajectories. We defined no or minimal fluctuations as achieving and maintaining the defined endpoint (≥ 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 75], ≥ 90% improvement in EASI, Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥ 4-point improvement, or Pruritus NRS ≥ 3-point improvement) for ≥ 80% of the study visits. If patients used rescue medication, discontinued treatment, or transferred to the escape arm, data collected at or after the event were imputed as non-response.
resultsThe proportions of lebrikizumab responders who maintained EASI 75 with no or minimal fluctuations were 70.8% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 71.2% (lebrikizumab Q4W), and 60.0% (lebrikizumab withdrawal). Of the patients with baseline Pruritus NRS ≥ 4 and who achieved ≥ 4-point improvement at Week 16, 66.1% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 62.7% (lebrikizumab Q4W), and 55.2% (lebrikizumab withdrawal) maintained ≥ 4-point Pruritus NRS improvement with no or minimal fluctuations.
conclusionsPatients who met the response criteria at Week 16 and continued treatment with lebrikizumab Q2W or Q4W demonstrated a stable response with no or minimal fluctuations of efficacy in measures of skin and itch up to Week 52. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT04146363 (ADvocate1) and NCT04178967 (ADvocate2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.