ArticleNature methods2024
Embedding AI in biology.
Article in Nature methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing generative large language models toward discriminative performance in protein function prediction.Genome biology · 2026Article
- SpikeLab: Agentic tools for spike data analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Decoding cell fate: integrated experimental and computational analysis at the single-cell level.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Medical laboratory data-based models: opportunities, obstacles, and solutions.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Can AI reveal the next generation of high-impact bone genomics targets?Bone reports · 2025Review
- The physics-AI dialogue in drug design.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- In Situ and Label-Free Quantification of Membrane Protein-Ligand Interactions Using Optical Imaging Techniques: A Review.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Implementing differentially pigmented skin models for predicting drug response variability across human ancestries.Human genomics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39122959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.