Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122952›Full record

ReviewNature methods2024

Transformers in single-cell omics: a review and new perspectives.

Artur Szałata, Karin Hrovatin, Sören Becker, Alejandro Tejada-Lapuerta, Haotian Cui, Bo Wang, Fabian J Theis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Artur SzałataInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8413-234X
Karin HrovatinInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-9645
Sören BeckerInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alejandro Tejada-LapuertaInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany.
Haotian CuiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8119-9485
Bo WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9620-3413
Fabian J TheisInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany. fabian.theis@helmholtz-munich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-1943

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) DGECR-2020-00294Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2020-06189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent efforts to construct reference maps of cellular phenotypes have expanded the volume and diversity of single-cell omics data, providing an unprecedented resource for studying cell properties. Despite the availability of rich datasets and their continued growth, current single-cell models are unable to fully capitalize on the information they contain. Transformers have become the architecture of choice for foundation models in other domains owing to their ability to generalize to heterogeneous, large-scale datasets. Thus, the question arises of whether transformers could set off a similar shift in the field of single-cell modeling. Here we first describe the transformer architecture and its single-cell adaptations and then present a comprehensive review of the existing applications of transformers in single-cell analysis and critically discuss their future potential for single-cell biology. By studying limitations and technical challenges, we aim to provide a structured outlook for future research directions at the intersection of machine learning and single-cell biology.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisAnimalsComputational BiologyGenomicsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.