Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122872›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2024

[Enucleations, eviscerations and orbital implants in German eye hospitals].

Anna Schuh, Nicolas Pensel, Siegfried Priglinger, Christoph Hintschich

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna SchuhKlinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland. anna.schuh@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-8753
Nicolas PenselKlinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Siegfried PriglingerKlinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Christoph HintschichKlinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of the number of enucleations and eviscerations performed in Germany and the orbital implants used.

methodAnalysis of the quality reports of German ophthalmological clinics for the years 2012-2021 provided by the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G‑BA).

resultsAlmost 10 times as many enucleations (8368) as eviscerations (975) are performed in Germany. After enucleation, alloplastic implants are used most frequently (44.6% alloplastic, no further specification, 30.0% alloplastic coated, no further specification; 14.1% microporous implants) and autologous dermis-fat grafts in 6.1% of the cases.

conclusionIn Germany, significantly more enucleations than eviscerations are performed. Alloplastic orbital implants are preferred for primary reconstruction following enucleation.

Indexed as

Eye EnucleationEye EviscerationOrbital ImplantsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGermanyHospitals, SpecialHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologyYoung AdultAlloplastic orbital implantsAutologous orbitals implantsDermis-fat graftsMicroporus orbital implantsPrimary socket reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID39122872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.