Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122869›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Repair of parastomal hernias with the intraperitoneal funnel meshes IPST-R and IPST.

Semen Ilgeldiev, Soeren Stoeckel, Axel Dievernich, Madeline Schmidt, Hagen Rudolph, Lutz Mirow

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Parastomal hernia in the difficult patient: is Tophat plasty the solution?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Semen IlgeldievDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Flemmingstraße 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany.
Soeren StoeckelDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Flemmingstraße 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany. s.stoeckel@skc.de.
Axel DievernichInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Madeline SchmidtDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Flemmingstraße 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany.
Hagen RudolphDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Flemmingstraße 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany.
Lutz MirowDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Flemmingstraße 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of parastomal hernias (PSH) represents a major challenge in hernia surgery. Various techniques have been reported with different outcomes in terms of complication and recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to share our initial experience with the implantation of the DynaMesh-IPST-R and -IPST, intraperitoneal funnel meshes made of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated for PSH between March 2019 and April 2023 using the chimney technique with the intraperitoneal funnel meshes IPST-R or IPST. The primary outcome was recurrence and the secondary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, the latter assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. A total of 21 consecutive patients were treated with intraperitoneal PVDF funnel meshes, 17 with IPST-R and 4 with IPST. There were no intraoperative complications. Overall, no complications occurred in 61.9% (n = 12) of the patients. Major postoperative complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) were noted in four cases (19.0%). During the mean follow-up period of 21.6 (range 4.8-37.5) months, one patient (4.8%) had a recurrence. In conclusion, for the treatment of parastomal hernias, the implantation of IPST-R or IPST mesh has proven to be efficient, easy to handle, and very safe. In particular, the low recurrence rate of 4.8%, which is in line with the current literature, is convincing. However, a larger number of patients would improve the validity of the results.

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphyPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical MeshAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorocarbon PolymersHernia, VentralHumansIncisional HerniaMaleMiddle AgedPolyvinylsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesFluorocarbon Polymerspolyvinylidene fluoridePolyvinylsChimney techniqueFunnel meshIPSTParastomal hernia repairPVDF

Identifiers

PMID39122869
PMCPMC11315879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.