Protein intakes for preterm infants, and the need for a multi-nutrient holistic approach.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral protein intake effects on growth in preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2025
   Pooled it
2. Impact of Prematurity on Nutrient Signaling and Protein Synthesis in Skeletal Muscle.Annual review of nutrition · 2026
   Review
3. Amino acids and lean mass accretion in preterm neonates.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
   Review
4. Controversies in Parenteral Protein Intake in Preterm Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Review
5. Formula protein versus human milk protein and the effects on growth in preterm born infants.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.