Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122809›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Phenotypic diversity in qualitative and quantitative traits for selection of high yield potential field pea genotypes.

Mohammad Golam Azam, Umakanta Sarker, Mohammad Amir Hossain, A K M Mahabubul Alam, Mohammad Rafiqul Islam, Nazmul Hossain, Saud Alamri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Screening of Different Pea (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad Golam AzamPulses Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Ishurdi, Pabna, 6620, Bangladesh.
Umakanta SarkerDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh. umakanta@bsmrau.edu.bd.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-8816
Mohammad Amir HossainDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh.
A K M Mahabubul AlamPulses Research Sub-Station, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Rafiqul IslamAgronomy Division, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Pabna, 6620, Bangladesh.
Nazmul HossainDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Saud AlamriDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) needs improvement to increase productivity due to its high price and demand. However, the incidence of powdery mildew (PM) disease limits its production. This study aimed to analyze the diversity of qualitative and quantitative traits against powdery mildew resistance by utilizing cluster and principal component analysis to explore PM resistance high-yield potential field peas. Shannon-Weaver's diversity index (H') displayed high intra-genotype diversity for quantitative and qualitative aspects. Heterogeneity was identified for resistance against powdery mildew infections. Eighty-five genotypes were divided into five groups using Mohalanobis generalized distance (D

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGenotypePhenotypePisum sativumPlant DiseasesAscomycotaGenetic VariationPlant BreedingPrincipal Component AnalysisQuantitative Trait, Heritable

Identifiers

PMID39122809
PMCPMC11316029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.