Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122771›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Label-free, non-contact determination of resting membrane potential using dielectrophoresis.

Michael Pycraft Hughes, Krista S P Clarke, Rashedul Hoque, Oreoluwa V Griffiths, Emily J Kruchek, Matthew P Johnson, Muhammad Hamza Tariq, Nupur Kohli, Rebecca Lewis, Fatima H Labeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. VScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael Pycraft HughesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Michael.hughes@ku.ac.ae.
Krista S P ClarkeCentre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Rashedul HoqueCentre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Oreoluwa V GriffithsCentre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Emily J KruchekCentre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Matthew P JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Muhammad Hamza TariqDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Nupur KohliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Rebecca LewisDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Fatima H LabeedDepartment of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE. f.labeed@uaeu.ac.ae.

Funding

Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research FSU-2022-020Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research,United Arab Emirates 8474000443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement of cellular resting membrane potential (RMP) is important in understanding ion channels and their role in regulation of cell function across a wide range of cell types. However, methods available for the measurement of RMP (including patch clamp, microelectrodes, and potential-sensitive fluorophores) are expensive, slow, open to operator bias, and often result in cell destruction. We present non-contact, label-free membrane potential estimation which uses dielectrophoresis to determine the cytoplasm conductivity slope as a function of medium conductivity. By comparing this to patch clamp data available in the literature, we have demonstratet the accuracy of this approach using seven different cell types, including primary suspension cells (red blood cells, platelets), cultured suspension cells (THP-1), primary adherent cells (chondrocytes, human umbilical mesenchymal stem cells), and adherent (HeLa) and suspension (Jurkat) cancer cell lines. Analysis of the effect of ion channel inhibitors suggests the effects of pharmaceutical agents (TEA on HeLa; DMSO and neuraminidase on red blood cells) can also be measured. Comparison with published values of membrane potential suggest that the differences between our estimates and values recorded by patch clamp are accurate to within published margins of error. The method is low-cost, non-destructive, operator-independent and label-free, and has previously been shown to allow cells to be recovered after measurement.

Indexed as

ElectrophoresisMembrane PotentialsErythrocytesHeLa CellsHumansJurkat CellsPatch-Clamp Techniques

Identifiers

PMID39122771
PMCPMC11316104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.