Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122740›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Investigation of adaptive muscle synergy modulated motor responses to grasping perturbations.

Eike Jakubowitz, Leonard Schmidt, Alina Obermeier, Svenja Spindeldreier, Henning Windhagen, Christof Hurschler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Motion analysis in Orthopaedic technology research].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eike JakubowitzLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-Von-Borries-Strasse 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Jakubowitz.Eike@mh-hannover.de.
Leonard SchmidtLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-Von-Borries-Strasse 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Alina ObermeierLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-Von-Borries-Strasse 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Svenja SpindeldreierInstitute of Mechatronic Systems, Leibniz University Hannover, An Der Universität 1, 30823, Garbsen, Germany.
Henning WindhagenLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-Von-Borries-Strasse 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Christof HurschlerLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-Von-Borries-Strasse 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated how muscle synergies adapt in response to unexpected changes in object weight during lifting tasks. The aim was to discover which motor control strategies individuals use to maintain their grasping performance. Muscle synergies were extracted from the muscle activity of fifteen healthy participants who lifted objects of identical appearance but varying weights in a randomized order, which introduced artificial perturbations. Reaching and manipulation phases of object lifting were analyzed using constrained non-negative matrix factorization and k-means clustering. Participants exhibited a perturbation-independent and thus consistent recruitment of spatial synergy components, while significant adaptations in muscle synergy activation occurred in response to unexpected perturbations. Perturbations caused by unexpectedly heavy objects led to delayed and gradual increases in muscle synergy activation until the force required to lift the object was reached. In contrast, perturbations caused by lighter objects led to reductions in excess muscle synergy activation occurring later. Sensorimotor control maintains the modularity of muscle synergies. Even when external mechanical perturbations occur, the grasping performance is preserved, and control is adapted solely through muscle synergy activation. These results suggest that using pure spatial synergy components as control signals for myoelectric arm prostheses may prevent them from malfunctioning due to external perturbations.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthMuscle, SkeletalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultExternal perturbationGrasping performanceMotor control strategiesMuscle synergiesMyoelectric arm prosthesesObject lifting

Identifiers

PMID39122740
PMCPMC11315883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.