Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122704›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2024

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 for chronic diarrhea in young adults: a large double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Ni Yang, Teng Ma, Yong Xie, Qiong Li, Yingmeng Li, Longjin Zheng, Yalin Li, Qiuping Xiao, Zhihong Sun, Kexuan Zuo and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Formulation-dependent kinetics ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. ISME communications · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Gut microbes · 2025
    Article
  14. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ni Yang *Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Teng Ma *Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3828-454X
Yong Xie *Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Qiong Li *State Key Laboratory for the Modernization of Classical and Famous Prescriptions of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Yingmeng LiKey Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Longjin ZhengState Key Laboratory for the Modernization of Classical and Famous Prescriptions of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Yalin LiKey Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Qiuping XiaoState Key Laboratory for the Modernization of Classical and Famous Prescriptions of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Zhihong SunKey Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7605-2048
Kexuan ZuoState Key Laboratory for the Modernization of Classical and Famous Prescriptions of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Lai-Yu KwokKey Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8791-1269
Nonghua LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China. lunonghua@ncu.edu.cn.
Wenjun LiuState Key Laboratory for the Modernization of Classical and Famous Prescriptions of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China. liuwenjun@crjz.com.
Heping ZhangKey Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China. hepingdd@vip.sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current treatments for chronic diarrhea have limited efficacy and several side effects. Probiotics have the potential to alleviate symptoms of diarrhea. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluates the effects of administering the probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 (P9) strain in young adults with chronic diarrhea (Clinical Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2000038410). The intervention period lasts for 28 days, followed by a 14-day post-intervention period. Participants are randomized into the P9 (n = 93) and placebo (n = 96) groups, with 170 individuals completing the double-blind intervention phase (n = 85 per group). The primary endpoint is the diarrhea symptom severity score. Both intention-to-treat (n = 189) and per-protocol (n = 170) analyses reveal a modest yet statistically significant reduction in diarrhea severity compared to the placebo group (20.0%, P = 0.050; 21.4%, P = 0.048, respectively). In conclusion, the results of this study support the use of probiotics in managing chronic diarrhea in young adults. However, the lack of blood parameter assessment and the short intervention period represent limitations of this study.

Indexed as

DiarrheaProbioticsAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLactiplantibacillus plantarumMaleTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39122704
PMCPMC11315937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.