ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2024
Venous thromboembolism: exploring incidence and utility of screening in individuals with dual diagnosis.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication following spinal cord injury (SCI) and brain injury (BI), leading to significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to explore the incidence of VTE in patients with the dual diagnosis (DD) of SCI and concomitant BI using ultrasonography.
designRetrospective study.
settingAcute rehabilitation hospital.
participantsThirty-one individuals admitted for DD rehabilitation who were routinely screened for VTE with ultrasound on admission.
interventionsNot applicable.
main outcome measuresRetrospective chart review was performed to identify whether patients were found to have DVT or PE at the following three time points: in acute care prior to admission to rehabilitation, at time of admission diagnosed via screening examination, and after admission to rehabilitation during the inpatient stay via post screening examinations. Retrospective chart review was also performed to identify incidence of bleeding.
results67.7% of individuals were found to have DVTs at any timepoint. Of these DVTs, 22.6% were identified in acute care, 48.4% on admission to rehabilitation, and 16.1% during the course of rehabilitation stay. Of those who were placed on therapeutic anticoagulation due to admission diagnosis of VTE, 25% developed recurrent DVT and 12.5% had bleeding complications. No cases of PE were observed in this study population.
conclusionsThis study found a high incidence of DVT for the DD population at all three timepoints with a high proportion identified via screening ultrasonography on admission to rehabilitation. Further research is needed to investigate the incidence of VTE and utility of screening ultrasonography in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.