ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2024
Three-Point Checklist Dermoscopy for Melanoma Screening: Experience in Medical Students New to Dermatology.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dermoscopy Education in Undergraduate Medical Education: Scoping Review of Pedagogical Approaches and Gaps.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly detection of melanoma and optimal referral to the specialist starts in primary care. Medical education is usually deficient in training general physicians in early detection and risk management for most skin malignancies. A three-point dermoscopy checklist is used as a screening tool for differentiating malignant and benign pigmented lesions in non-expert clinicians using dermoscopy.
objectivesTo evaluate the impact of brief medical training on the three-point dermoscopy algorithm in third-year medical students new to dermatology and to determine the levels of sensitivity and specificity to differentiate malignant and benign pigmented lesions.
methodsOptional dermoscopy lecture for third-year medical students new to dermatology in the context of general medical semiology courses, with case discussion and evaluation of 50 dermoscopy cases (25 benign and 25 malignant). Students were asked to classify malignant versus benign pathology based on the three-point dermoscopy algorithm discussed. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated according to the students' responses.
resultsSixty-five students provided 3250 responses. Malignant pathology was misclassified as benign in 154 responses, while benign pathology was misclassified as malignant in 668 responses. Sensitivity and specificity for differentiating malignant lesions were 89.70% and 61.99%, respectively. Moderate interobserver agreement was found (Kappa value = 0.50; [CI: 0.47-0.54]).
conclusionWhen evaluating melanocytic lesions, the focus of primary healthcare and general medical education should emphasize the correct determination of malignant or benign pathology. Teaching the three-point dermoscopy rule to medical students new to dermatology yields satisfactory levels of sensitivity and specificity, comparable to general physicians.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.