ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2024
Topical Corticophobia Among Healthcare Professionals in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Rasch Validation of the Parental Topical Corticosteroid Phobia Scale (PTCPS) in Pediatric Eczema Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment and Knowledge of Long-Term Steroid Use and Its Related Cataract & Glaucoma Development Among Hail Residents.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCorticophobia constitutes a complex challenge affecting patients and healthcare professionals alike, resulting in suboptimal management and treatment of dermatological conditions.
objectivesThis study aims to investigate corticophobia among physicians in Saudi Arabia and identify associated factors.
methodsThis is a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study that included 700 participants. The sample constituted dermatologists, pediatricians, and family medicine practitioners at different levels (consultants, fellows, and residents) in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via an electronic survey addressing demographic information and corticophobia-related questions.
resultsA total of 700 participants were included in the data analysis. Dermatologists were the most comfortable prescribing steroids (32%), followed by family medicine physicians (25%), and pediatricians (18%). Pediatricians were the most hesitant to prescribe steroids. Fellows were the most confident in prescribing steroids. Physicians from the northern and western regions were least likely to be hesitant in prescribing steroids.
conclusionsIn conclusion, this study reveals that in Saudi Arabia, dermatologists were the most comfortable prescribing topical corticosteroids, with pediatricians being the most hesitant. The findings emphasize the importance of education in addressing corticophobia among healthcare professionals, which could improve treatment adherence and patient outcomes. Further research and targeted educational interventions are necessary to enhance understanding and confidence in prescribing topical corticosteroids among healthcare professionals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.