Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122406›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Animations to communicate public health prevention messages: a realist review protocol.

Kathleen McCorry, Gregory Maniatopoulos, Linda Errington, Ellie Land, Michael Craig, Santosh Vijaykumar, Till Bärnighausen, Nicola O'Brien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathleen McCorryHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-2150-4476
Gregory ManiatopoulosUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Linda ErringtonWalton Library, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ellie LandDepartment of Arts, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Michael CraigDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Santosh VijaykumarDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicola O'BrienDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK nicki.obrien@northumbria.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-6871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith digital and social media advances, animated health communications (health animations) are highly prevalent globally, yet the evidence base underpinning them remains unclear and limited. While individual studies have attempted to explore the effectiveness, acceptability and usability of specific features of health animations, there is substantial heterogeneity in study design, comparators and the animation design and content. Consequently, there is a need to synthesise evidence of health animations using an approach that recognises this contextual complexity, which may affect their impact. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This project aims to understand why, how, for whom, to what extent and in which contexts health animations are expected to promote preventive health behaviours. We will conduct a realist review following Pawson's five iterative stages to (1) define the review scope and locate existing theories; (2) search for evidence; (3) select and appraise evidence; (4) extract data and (5) synthesise data and refine theory. Engagement with stakeholders involved in developing, testing, implementing or commissioning health communications, including animations, will allow the initial programme theory to be tested and refined. The findings will be reported in accordance with Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the public stakeholder work was provided by the Northumbria University Research Ethics Committee. We will disseminate the findings widely through outputs tailored to target specific professional, public and patient audiences. Dissemination will occur through stakeholder engagement as part of the research, a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023447127.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationHealth PromotionPublic HealthHumansResearch DesignReview Literature as TopicSocial MediaBehaviorHealth LiteracyPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID39122406
PMCPMC11331919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.