Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122404›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Impact of the Korea Early Childhood Home-visiting Intervention (KECHI) on child health and development and maternal health: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Young-Ho Khang, Yu-Mi Kim, Joo Hyun Kim, Jungok Yu, Rora Oh, Kyung Ja June, Sung-Hyun Cho, Ji Yun Lee, Hong-Jun Cho

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04749888 (Impact of the Korea Early Childhood Home-visiting Intervention on Childhood Health and Development and Maternal Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04749888 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Impact of the Korea Early Childhood Home-visiting Intervention on Childhood Health and Development and Maternal Health: A Randomized Controlled Community Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2021 to 2045Enrolled800ConditionsChild Development, Parenting, Infant Development, Pregnancy RelatedArmsTargeted nurse-led home visiting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Young-Ho KhangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea yhkhang@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-9585-8266
Yu-Mi KimThe Support Team for the Early Life Health Management Program, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1123-8690
Joo Hyun KimInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-2922
Jungok YuDepartment of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8062-0207
Rora OhGraduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8182-9616
Kyung Ja JuneInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2745-5107
Sung-Hyun ChoThe Support Team for the Early Life Health Management Program, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1365-1879
Ji Yun LeeThe Support Team for the Early Life Health Management Program, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6023-5723
Hong-Jun ChoThe Support Team for the Early Life Health Management Program, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-6549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) of early childhood home-visiting interventions led by nurses have been conducted mainly in Western countries, whereas such trials have been limited in non-Western cultures, including Asia. In South Korea, a national nurse home visit programme (Korea Early Childhood Home-visiting Intervention (KECHI)) was developed in 2020 and launched throughout the country. We designed a pragmatic RCT to evaluate the effectiveness of KECHI on child health and development and maternal health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eligible participants will be pregnant women at <37 weeks of gestation with risk factor scores of 2 or over, who are sufficiently fluent in Korean to read and answer the questionnaire written in Korean and live in districts where the KECHI services are available. Eight hundred participants will be recruited from the general community and through the District Public Health Centres. The participants will be randomised 1:1 to KECHI plus usual care or usual care. KECHI encompasses 25-29 home visits, group activities and community service linkage. Participants will complete assessments at baseline (<37 weeks gestation), 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post partum. The six primary outcomes will be (1) home environment (assessed by Infant/Toddler Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment), (2) emergency department visits due to injuries, (3) child development (assessed using Korean Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III), (4) breastfeeding duration, (5) maternal self-rated health and (6) community service linkage. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has received full ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Hospital. Written consent will be obtained from the participants. The results will be reported at conferences, disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and used by the Korean government to expand the KECHI services. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04749888.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChild HealthHouse CallsMaternal HealthChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyRepublic of Koreacommunity child healthnursing carepublic healthrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID39122404
PMCPMC11404167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.