Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122400›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Impact of the diagnostic label for a low-risk prostate lesion: protocol for two online factorial randomised experiments.

James Bullen, Brooke Nickel, Kirsten McCaffery, Timothy J Wilt, Jenna Smith, Farzaneh Boroumand, Lisa Parker, Jeremy Millar, John Brandt Brodersen, Philipp Dahm and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

James BullenSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Brooke NickelSydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8100-4278
Kirsten McCafferySydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2696-5006
Timothy J WiltCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research and Minneapolis VA High Value Care Initiative, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jenna SmithSydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0480-8125
Farzaneh BoroumandSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lisa ParkerSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jeremy MillarRadiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-8602
John Brandt BrodersenCentre of General Practice, Department of Public Health & Research Unit for General Practice, Region Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Philipp DahmDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Brett DelahuntWellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Murali VarmaDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Paul GlasziouInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7564-073X
Andrew WardenWiser Healthcare Research Collaboration, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lawrence DillerWiser Healthcare Research Collaboration, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Larry BillingtonHealth Consumers New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Christo van RensburgHealth Consumers New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Katy BellSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia katy.bell@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-3218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany types of prostate cancer present minimal risk to a man's lifespan or well-being, but existing terminology makes it difficult for men to distinguish these from high-risk prostate cancers. This study aims to explore whether using an alternative label for low-risk prostate cancer influences management choice and anxiety levels among Australian men and their partners. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will run two separate studies for Australian men and Australian women with a male partner. Both studies are between-subjects factorial (3×2) randomised online hypothetical experiments. Following consent, eligible participants will be randomised 1:1:1 to three labels: 'low-risk prostate cancer, Gleason Group 1', 'low-risk prostate neoplasm' or 'low-risk prostate lesion'. Participants will then undergo a second randomisation step with 1:1 allocation to the provision of detailed information on the benefits and harms of different management choices versus the provision of less detailed information about management choices. The required sample sizes are 1290 men and 1410 women. The primary outcome is the participant choice of their preferred management strategy: no immediate treatment (prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based monitoring or active surveillance using PSA, MRI, biopsy with delayed treatment for disease progression) versus immediate treatment (prostatectomy or radiation therapy). Secondary outcomes include preferred management choice (from the four options listed above), diagnosis anxiety, management choice anxiety and management choice at a later time point (for participants who initially choose a monitoring strategy). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been received from The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/572). The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal and a plain language summary of the findings will be shared on the Wiser Healthcare publications page http://www.wiserhealthcare.org.au/category/publications/ TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ID 386701 and 386889).

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAnxietyAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentWatchful WaitingProstate-Specific AntigenAdverse eventsClinical Decision-MakingClinical TrialPatient-Centered CareProstatic NeoplasmsSurgical pathology

Identifiers

PMID39122400
PMCPMC11331948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.