Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122393›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2024

Quantitative analysis of nortriptyline's analgesic properties: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.

Soroush Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Mortazavi, Ramin Abdi Dezfouli

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Soroush HashemzadehFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad MortazaviFaculty of Medicine, Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).
Ramin Abdi DezfouliChronic Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of) Raminabdi77@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7875-7351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to quantitatively analyse nortriptyline's analgesic potency, safety and tolerability.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: The systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed in February 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of nortriptyline in reducing pain scores (open-label studies and comparisons of nortriptyline with placebo or other analgesics) in different pain types were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The data extraction procedure and the screening phases were carried out based on predetermined eligibility criteria. To pool the data, the standardised mean difference (SMD) and standardised mean change (SMC) methods, along with random-effect and fixed-effect meta-analysis, were used. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration method, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria were used to measure the certainty of the results.

results14 of the initial 648 studies were eventually imported. Nortriptyline was reported to significantly reduce pain severity in chronic low back pain, painful symptoms in major depressive disorder, neuropathy, chronic pelvic pain and neuropathic corneal pain. However, it was not superior to placebo in fibromyalgia and knee osteoarthritis. In comparison to placebo and various alternative analgesics, the pooled SMD for lowering pain scores was 0.43 (0.23-0.64) and -0.18 (-0.39 to 0.03), respectively. In the pretreatment and post-treatment analyses, the pooled SMC was -1.20 (-1.48 to -0.93). Although constipation and xerostomia were the most commonly reported side effects, all references indicated that the adverse events were well tolerated at the administered dosages.

conclusionWhile nortriptyline is effective in some chronic pains, such as neuropathies, it lacks efficacy in some other chronic pains, such as fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis. Nortriptyline is well tolerated when administered in doses intended for its analgesic effects. Moreover, several studies suggested that the analgesic effects of nortriptyline are comparable to those of amitriptyline and gabapentin.

Indexed as

NortriptylineAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticHumansPain MeasurementAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticNortriptylineChronic PainCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYPain managementPAIN MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID39122393
PMCPMC11404244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.