ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Efficacy of weekly dose of 1% atropine for myopia control in Chinese children.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of different atropine regimens: MOSAIC2.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Axial length changes and baseline predictors over five years in children treated with orthokeratology lenses: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Choroidal thickness and peripapillary RNFL in relation to axial length and progression in myopic children.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Microbial and Chemical Stability of Unpreserved Atropine Sulfate 0.01%Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Decision Tree Modeling to Predict Myopia Progression in Children Treated with Atropine: Toward Precision Ophthalmology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the effect of weekly 1% atropine use on children's myopia progression and whether the effect is sustainable.
methodsMedical records of myopic children aged 3-15 years receiving weekly 1% atropine for more than 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Axial length (AL) and spherical equivalent refraction (SER) at every visit were collected. The changes in AL or SER over time were analysed using generalised estimating equation. The related factors of myopic progression were performed by multiple linear regression. The performance of short-term AL change to predict atropine-poor responders (AL change >0.2 mm/year) was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
resultsA total of 694 participants with a mean age of 8.83 years were included. The participants with follow-up time reached 1, 2, 3 and 4 years were 256 (36.9%), 250 (36.0%), 143 (20.6%) and 45 (6.5%) separately. The cumulative change in AL was 0.05 mm, 0.24 mm, 0.47 mm, 0.56 mm separately for 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 4- year treatment. Approximate 0.20 mm elongation per year was observed since the second-year of the treatment. Older age and lower initial myopic refraction were independently associated with less myopic progression. A decrease in AL of more than 0.04 mm during the initial 2 months could serve as an indicator for identifying fast progressors (AL change >0.2 mm/year) over a 2-year period, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 0.78 and 0.73, respectively.
conclusionWeekly 1% atropine may be a potentially effective treatment with longer lasting effects for children with myopia control especially in those with older age and lower myopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.