Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39122222›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2024

Added prognostic value of visually estimated coronary artery calcium among heart transplant recipients.

Kevin J Clerkin, Lorenzo Sewanan, Jan M Griffin, Ersilia M DeFilippis, Boyu Peng, Margarita Chernovolenko, Erin Harris, Nikil Prasad, Paolo C Colombo, Melana Yuzefpolskaya and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Non-invasive imaging in heart transplant recipients: state of art and future direction.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kevin J ClerkinMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: kjc2142@cumc.columbia.edu.
Lorenzo SewananMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Jan M GriffinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Ersilia M DeFilippisMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Boyu PengDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Margarita ChernovolenkoMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Erin HarrisMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Nikil PrasadMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Paolo C ColomboMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Melana YuzefpolskayaMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Justin FriedMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Jayant RaikhelkarMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Veli K TopkaraMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Michelle CastilloMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Elaine Y LamMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Farhana LatifMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Koji TakedaDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Nir UrielMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Gabriel SayerMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Andrew J EinsteinMilstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.

Funding

Role of RNA helicase Ddx5 in pathological cardiac remodelingR01HL170132 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Veli Kemal Topkara · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
Identifying Novel Diagnostics and Mechanisms for Cardiac Allograft VasculopathyK23HL148528 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CLERKIN, KEVIN J · 2020 to 2024
$852k
Defining the Role of lnc-TECRL in Maladaptive Cardiac RemodelingK08HL146964 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TOPKARA, VELI KEMAL · 2019 to 2022
$671k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL146964NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL148528NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL170132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become a valid screening modality for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) following heart transplantation (HT). Visually estimated coronary artery calcium (VECAC) can be quantified from CT images obtained as part of PET/CT and has been shown to be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in coronary artery disease. We investigated the prognostic value of VECAC following HT.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 430 consecutive adult HT patients who underwent

resultsThe cohort was 73% male, 33% had diabetes, 67% had estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min, median age was 61 years, and median time since HT was 7.5 years. VECAC alone was insufficiently sensitive to screen for CAV. During a median follow-up of 4.2 years ninety patients experienced death or retransplantation. Compared with those with VECAC 0, patients VECAC 10-99 (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.23-4.14, p = 0.009) and VECAC 100+ (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.96-5.99, p < 0.001) experienced an increased risk of death/retransplantation. The association was similar for cardiovascular death and cardiovascular hospitalization. After adjusting for other predictors of death/retransplantation, VECAC 10-99 (VECAC 10-99: aHR 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.71 p = 0.04) and VECAC 100+ (VECAC 100+: aHR 2.33, 95% CI 1.17-4.63, p = 0.02) remained independently associated with death/retransplantation.

conclusionsVECAC is an independent prognostic marker of death/retransplantation following HT and merits inclusion as a part of post-HT surveillance PET/CT.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsHeart TransplantationPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesVascular Calcificationcardiac allograft vasculopathycardiac positron emission tomographycoronary artery calciumheart transplantsurvival

Identifiers

PMID39122222
PMCPMC11532001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.