Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39121968›Full record

ArticleJournal of virological methods2024

An automated assay platform for the evaluation of antiviral compounds against polioviruses.

Eric E Rhoden, Bernardo A Mainou

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virological methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric E RhodenPolio and Picornavirus Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: erhoden@cdc.gov.
Bernardo A MainouPolio and Picornavirus Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput screening requires assays that have flexibility to test large numbers of specimens while being accurate to ensure reproducibility across all specimens and variables tested. Previously, we used a low-throughput, cell-based assay to identify compounds with antiviral activity against polioviruses. In this report, we report the development and implementation of a high-throughput automation platform for the identification of compounds with antiviral activity against polioviruses. The platform uses off-the-shelf automated equipment combined with a modified assay, with minimal changes to existing laboratory space. We evaluated automation systems from Hudson Robotics Inc., Agilent Technologies, and a microplate reader from PerkinElmer during the platform design. Optimization for high throughput was focused on bulk reagent additions, serial dilutions, microplate washing and measuring results from the tens-to-hundreds of microplates. We evaluated the automated cell-based assay for selectivity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and reproducibility. This platform can be applied to screen novel antivirals against polioviruses and non-polio enteroviruses.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysPoliovirusAutomationAutomation, LaboratoryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansPoliomyelitisReproducibility of ResultsAntiviral AgentsCell cytotoxic infectious dose (CCID(50))Coefficient of variationPoliovirusViral cytopathic effect (CPE)

Identifiers

PMID39121968
PMCPMC11881792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.