Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39121881›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2024

Completion axillary lymph node dissection for the identification of pN2-3 status as an indication for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, phase 3 SENOMAC trial.

Jana de Boniface, Matilda Appelgren, Robert Szulkin, Sara Alkner, Yvette Andersson, Leif Bergkvist, Jan Frisell, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Michalis Kontos, Thorsten Kühn and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02240472 (Survival and Axillary Recurrence Following Sentinel Node-positive Breast Cancer Without Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection - a Randomized Study of Patients With Macrometastases in the Sentinel Node), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02240472 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Survival and Axillary Recurrence Following Sentinel Node-positive Breast Cancer Without Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection - a Randomized Study of Patients With Macrometastases in the Sentinel Node

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2015 to 2031Enrolled2,766ConditionsBreast CancerArmsOmission of axillary clearance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Axillary surgery in the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors era: no time to move backward.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jana de BonifaceDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Breast Center, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: jana.de-boniface@ki.se.
Matilda AppelgrenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Breast Center, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Robert SzulkinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Cytel, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara AlknerFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Yvette AnderssonDepartment of Surgery, Vastmanland Hospital Vasteras, Vasteras, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University and Region Vastmanland, Vastmanland Hospital Vasteras, Vasteras, Sweden.
Leif BergkvistCentre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University and Region Vastmanland, Vastmanland Hospital Vasteras, Vasteras, Sweden.
Jan FrisellDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Breast Center Karolinska, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oreste Davide GentiliniBreast Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy.
Michalis Kontos1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Thorsten KühnDie Filderklinik, Breast Center, Filderstadt, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Dan LundstedtDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Birgitte Vrou OffersenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark.
Roger Olofsson BaggeDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Toralf ReimerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Malin SundDepartment of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Diagnostics and Intervention-Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Peer ChristiansenDepartment of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lisa RydénFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Gastroenterology and Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Malmö, Sweden.
Tove Filtenborg TvedskovFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Breast Surgery, Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark.
SENOMAC Trialists’ Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn luminal breast cancer, adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors (eg, abemaciclib) improve invasive disease-free survival. In patients with T1-2, grade 1-2 tumours, and one or two sentinel lymph node metastases, completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) is the only prognostic tool available that can reveal four or more nodal metastases (pN2-3), which is the only indication for adjuvant abemaciclib in this setting. However, this technique can lead to substantial arm morbidity in patients. We aimed to pragmatically describe the potential benefit and harm of this strategy on the individual patient level in patients from the ongoing SENOMAC trial.

methodsIn the randomised, phase 3, SENOMAC trial, patients aged 18 years or older, of any performance status, with clinically node-negative T1-T3 breast cancer and one or two sentinel node macrometastases from 67 sites in five European countries (Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Sweden) were randomly assigned (1:1), via permutated block randomisation (random block size of 2 and 4) stratified by country, to either cALND or its omission (ie, they had a sentinel lymph node biopsy only). The primary outcome is overall survival, which is yet to be reported. In this post-hoc analysis, patients from the SENOMAC per-protocol population, with luminal oestrogen-receptor positive, HER2-negative, T1-2, histological grade 1-2 breast cancer, with tumour size of 5 cm or smaller were selected to match the characteristics of cohort 1 of the monarchE trial who would only have an indication for adjuvant abemaciclib if found to have 4 or more nodal metastases. The primary study objective was to determine the number of patients who developed patient-reported severe or very severe impairment of physical arm function after cALND (as measured by the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health [Lymph-ICF] Questionnaire) 1 year after surgery to avoid one invasive disease-free survival event at 5 years with 2 years of adjuvant abemaciclib, using invasive disease-free survival event data from cohort 1 of the monarchE trial. The SENOMAC trial is registered with ClincialTrials.gov, NCT02240472, and is closed to accrual and ongoing.

findingsBetween Jan 31, 2015, and Dec 31, 2021, 2766 patients were enrolled in SENOMAC and randomly assigned to cALND (n=1384) or sentinel node biopsy only (n=1382), of whom 2540 were included in the per-protocol population. 1705 (67%) of 2540 patients met this post-hoc study's eligibility criteria, of whom 802 (47%) had a cALND and 903 (53%) had a sentinel lymph node biopsy only. Median age at randomisation was 62 years (IQR 52-71), 1699 (>99%) of 1705 patients were female, and six (<1%) were male. Among 1342 patients who responded to questionnaires, after a median follow-up of 45·2 months (IQR 25·6-59·8; data cutoff Nov 17, 2023), patient-reported severe or very severe impairment of physical arm function was reported in 84 (13%) of 634 patients who had cALND versus 30 (4%) of 708 who had sentinel lymph node biopsy only (χ

interpretationAs a method to potentially identify an indication for abemaciclib, and subsequently avoid invasive disease-free survival events at 5 years with 2 years of adjuvant abemaciclib, cALND carries a substantial risk of severe or very severe arm morbidity and so cALND should be discouraged for this purpose.

fundingSwedish Research Council, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Nordic Cancer Union, and the Swedish Breast Cancer Association.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionAdultAgedAminopyridinesAxillaBenzimidazolesChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Disease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingabemaciclibAminopyridinesBenzimidazolesCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.