Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2024
Completion axillary lymph node dissection for the identification of pN2-3 status as an indication for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, phase 3 SENOMAC trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02240472 (Survival and Axillary Recurrence Following Sentinel Node-positive Breast Cancer Without Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection - a Randomized Study of Patients With Macrometastases in the Sentinel Node), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Survival and Axillary Recurrence Following Sentinel Node-positive Breast Cancer Without Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection - a Randomized Study of Patients With Macrometastases in the Sentinel Node
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multidisciplinary Practical Guidance for Implementing Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Patients with HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Guideline
- Impact of Omission of Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery on Radiation Treatment in Patients Age 50 and Older with Breast Cancer Treated with Lumpectomy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Role of Sentinel Node Surgery in Identifying Candidates for Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Implications of Choosing Wisely and ASCO Omission Criteria.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Does the Axilla Still Matter? Rethinking Nodal Staging in the Era of CDK4/6 Inhibition.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Omitting axillary lymph node dissection or not? A multicenter, retrospective study for breast cancer patients potentially eligible for abemaciclib since the SENOMAC trial.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Locoregional Considerations for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.Current breast cancer reports · 2026Review
- Axillary surgery in the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors era: no time to move backward.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Review
- Robot-assisted Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Review
- From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Review
- Iodine Seed-Marking Protocol for Response-Guided Axillary Treatment After Systemic Therapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2025Article
- BJS commission on the surgical management of the axilla in breast cancer.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Axillary dissection should not be performed in breast cancer patients with limited nodal disease to determine abemaciclib candidacy.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Deep learning assisted non-invasive lymph node burden evaluation and CDK4/6i administration in luminal breast cancer.iScience · 2025Article
- How can we optimize the surgical management of the axilla in breast cancer since the MonarchE trial?Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Evaluating axillary lymph node metastasis risks in breast cancer patients via Semi-ALNP: a multicenter study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- How to choose optimal adjuvant therapies for high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer after chemotherapy?Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Review
- Predicting pathologic ≥N2 disease in women with breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Should abemaciclib candidacy be an indication for ALND?-commentary on SENOMAC post-hoc analysis.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Risking arm lymphedema in more than a hundred patients to benefit one patient-is it worth it?Gland surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn luminal breast cancer, adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors (eg, abemaciclib) improve invasive disease-free survival. In patients with T1-2, grade 1-2 tumours, and one or two sentinel lymph node metastases, completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) is the only prognostic tool available that can reveal four or more nodal metastases (pN2-3), which is the only indication for adjuvant abemaciclib in this setting. However, this technique can lead to substantial arm morbidity in patients. We aimed to pragmatically describe the potential benefit and harm of this strategy on the individual patient level in patients from the ongoing SENOMAC trial.
methodsIn the randomised, phase 3, SENOMAC trial, patients aged 18 years or older, of any performance status, with clinically node-negative T1-T3 breast cancer and one or two sentinel node macrometastases from 67 sites in five European countries (Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Sweden) were randomly assigned (1:1), via permutated block randomisation (random block size of 2 and 4) stratified by country, to either cALND or its omission (ie, they had a sentinel lymph node biopsy only). The primary outcome is overall survival, which is yet to be reported. In this post-hoc analysis, patients from the SENOMAC per-protocol population, with luminal oestrogen-receptor positive, HER2-negative, T1-2, histological grade 1-2 breast cancer, with tumour size of 5 cm or smaller were selected to match the characteristics of cohort 1 of the monarchE trial who would only have an indication for adjuvant abemaciclib if found to have 4 or more nodal metastases. The primary study objective was to determine the number of patients who developed patient-reported severe or very severe impairment of physical arm function after cALND (as measured by the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health [Lymph-ICF] Questionnaire) 1 year after surgery to avoid one invasive disease-free survival event at 5 years with 2 years of adjuvant abemaciclib, using invasive disease-free survival event data from cohort 1 of the monarchE trial. The SENOMAC trial is registered with ClincialTrials.gov, NCT02240472, and is closed to accrual and ongoing.
findingsBetween Jan 31, 2015, and Dec 31, 2021, 2766 patients were enrolled in SENOMAC and randomly assigned to cALND (n=1384) or sentinel node biopsy only (n=1382), of whom 2540 were included in the per-protocol population. 1705 (67%) of 2540 patients met this post-hoc study's eligibility criteria, of whom 802 (47%) had a cALND and 903 (53%) had a sentinel lymph node biopsy only. Median age at randomisation was 62 years (IQR 52-71), 1699 (>99%) of 1705 patients were female, and six (<1%) were male. Among 1342 patients who responded to questionnaires, after a median follow-up of 45·2 months (IQR 25·6-59·8; data cutoff Nov 17, 2023), patient-reported severe or very severe impairment of physical arm function was reported in 84 (13%) of 634 patients who had cALND versus 30 (4%) of 708 who had sentinel lymph node biopsy only (χ
interpretationAs a method to potentially identify an indication for abemaciclib, and subsequently avoid invasive disease-free survival events at 5 years with 2 years of adjuvant abemaciclib, cALND carries a substantial risk of severe or very severe arm morbidity and so cALND should be discouraged for this purpose.
fundingSwedish Research Council, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Nordic Cancer Union, and the Swedish Breast Cancer Association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39121881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.