Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39121160›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Riemannian geometry for efficient analysis of protein dynamics data.

Willem Diepeveen, Carlos Esteve-Yagüe, Jan Lellmann, Ozan Öktem, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Riemannian geometry for efficient analysis of protein dynamics data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Willem DiepeveenFaculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, CB3 0WA Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4690-9258
Carlos Esteve-YagüeFaculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, CB3 0WA Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-0163
Jan LellmannInstitute of Mathematics and Image Computing, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Ozan ÖktemDepartment of Mathematics, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan (KTH), 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-6483
Carola-Bibiane SchönliebFaculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, CB3 0WA Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Marie Skodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 777826 NoMADSPhilip Leverhulme Prize NASwedish Foundation for Strategic Research AM13-0049Swedish Research Council 2020-03107the Alan Turing Institute NAthe Cantab Capital Institute for the Mathematics of Information NAthe Royal Society Wolfson Fellowship NAUKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/V029428/1 EP/S026045/1 EP/T003553/1 EP/N014588/1 EP/T017961/1Wellcome Innovator Awards 215733/Z/19/Z and 221633/Z/20/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasingly common viewpoint is that protein dynamics datasets reside in a nonlinear subspace of low conformational energy. Ideal data analysis tools should therefore account for such nonlinear geometry. The Riemannian geometry setting can be suitable for a variety of reasons. First, it comes with a rich mathematical structure to account for a wide range of geometries that can be modeled after an energy landscape. Second, many standard data analysis tools developed for data in Euclidean space can be generalized to Riemannian manifolds. In the context of protein dynamics, a conceptual challenge comes from the lack of guidelines for constructing a smooth Riemannian structure based on an energy landscape. In addition, computational feasibility in computing geodesics and related mappings poses a major challenge. This work considers these challenges. The first part of the paper develops a local approximation technique for computing geodesics and related mappings on Riemannian manifolds in a computationally feasible manner. The second part constructs a smooth manifold and a Riemannian structure that is based on an energy landscape for protein conformations. The resulting Riemannian geometry is tested on several data analysis tasks relevant for protein dynamics data. In particular, the geodesics with given start- and end-points approximately recover corresponding molecular dynamics trajectories for proteins that undergo relatively ordered transitions with medium-sized deformations. The Riemannian protein geometry also gives physically realistic summary statistics and retrieves the underlying dimension even for large-sized deformations within seconds on a laptop.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationProteinsAlgorithmsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsdimension reductioninterpolationmanifold-valued dataprotein dynamicsRiemannian manifold

Identifiers

PMID39121160
PMCPMC11331106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.