ArticlePloS one2024
Evaluating variable selection methods for multivariable regression models: A simulation study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective development and validation of an objective classification for difficult facemask ventilation: the MASCAN score.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Feline haemotropic Mycoplasma spp. in Portugal: association with identifiable risk factors, clinical parameters and prognostic factors.Companion animal health and genetics · 2026Article
- Review of risk factors and prediction models for multidrug-resistant bacterial pulmonary infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Modeling multistage transition probability in blood pressure progression stages among hypertensive patients, southern Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Determinants of COVID-19 prevalence in Central Java, Indonesia: An ecological study of socio-demographic, environmental, and healthcare factors.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
- Effect of vitamin D deficiency on pregnancy outcomes in obese and non-obese pregnant women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Prediction of acute kidney injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning using the PKIP score.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic predictors of glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Nigerian population: implications for public health and service delivery.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Determinants of animal-source food consumption in children 6-48 months in livestock-keeping households in Narok County, Kenya.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Becoming unemployed after a cancer diagnosis: associated characteristics and its impact on daily life.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Reply to: Methodological concerns regarding stepwise regression and construct overlap in caregiver burden research.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2026Article
- Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis risk in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on multiple model comparisons.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and risk factors for endoparasite infection in subtropical feral cattle in Hong Kong.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025Article
- Assessing geometric microliths as cultural markers through an analysis of shape variation and projectile performance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Systematic Study of Popular Software Packages and AI/ML Models for Calibrating In Situ Air Quality Data: An Example with Purple Air Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- A Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram Predicts Early Tumor Necrosis After Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers often perform data-driven variable selection when modeling the associations between an outcome and multiple independent variables in regression analysis. Variable selection may improve the interpretability, parsimony and/or predictive accuracy of a model. Yet variable selection can also have negative consequences, such as false exclusion of important variables or inclusion of noise variables, biased estimation of regression coefficients, underestimated standard errors and invalid confidence intervals, as well as model instability. While the potential advantages and disadvantages of variable selection have been discussed in the literature for decades, few large-scale simulation studies have neutrally compared data-driven variable selection methods with respect to their consequences for the resulting models. We present the protocol for a simulation study that will evaluate different variable selection methods: forward selection, stepwise forward selection, backward elimination, augmented backward elimination, univariable selection, univariable selection followed by backward elimination, and penalized likelihood approaches (Lasso, relaxed Lasso, adaptive Lasso). These methods will be compared with respect to false inclusion and/or exclusion of variables, consequences on bias and variance of the estimated regression coefficients, the validity of the confidence intervals for the coefficients, the accuracy of the estimated variable importance ranking, and the predictive performance of the selected models. We consider both linear and logistic regression in a low-dimensional setting (20 independent variables with 10 true predictors and 10 noise variables). The simulation will be based on real-world data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Publishing this study protocol ahead of performing the simulation increases transparency and allows integrating the perspective of other experts into the study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.