ArticlePloS one2024
Compromised heat loss leads to a delayed ice slurry induced reduction in heat storage.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compromised heat loss due to limited convection and evaporation can increase thermal strain. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of ice slurry ingestion to reduce thermal strain following hyperthermia in a state of compromised heat loss. Twelve healthy males (age: 25 ± 4y) underwent hot water immersion to elevate rectal temperature (Trec) by 1.82 ± 0.08°C on four occasions. In the subsequent 60-min of seated recovery, participants ingested either 6.8 g·kg-1 of ice slurry (-0.6°C) or control drink (37°C) in ambient conditions (21 ± 1°C, 39 ± 10% relative humidity), wearing either t-shirt and shorts (2 trials: ICE and CON) or a whole-body sweat suit (2 trials: ICE-SS and CON-SS). Trec and mean skin temperature (Tsk) were recorded and a two-compartment thermometry model of heat storage was calculated. Heat storage was lower in ICE compared with CON at 20-40min (p ≤ 0.044, d ≥ 0.88) and for ICE-SS compared with CON-SS at 40-60 min (p ≤ 0.012, d ≥ 0.93). Trec was lower in ICE compared with CON from 30-60min (p ≤ 0.034, d ≥ 0.65), with a trend for a reduced Trec in ICE-SS compared with CON-SS at 40min (p = 0.079, d = 0.60). A greater Tsk was found in ICE-SS and CON-SS compared with ICE and CON (p < 0.001, d ≥ 3.37). A trend for a lower Tsk for ICE compared with CON was found at 20-40min (p ≤ 0.099, d ≥ 0.53), no differences were found for ICE-SS vs CON-SS (p ≥ 0.554, d ≤ 0.43). Ice slurry ingestion can effectively reduce heat storage when heat loss through convection and evaporation is compromised, relevant to those wearing personal protective equipment or those with compromised sweat loss. Compromised heat loss delays the reduction in heat storage, possibly related to ice slurry ingestion not lowering Tsk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.