Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39121005›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2024

Patient satisfaction following treatment with micro-focused ultrasound with visualization: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Abrar Bukhari, Asem Shadid, Abdullah Al-Omair, Ashjan Alheggi, Eman Abdulaziz Almukhadeb, Salma Y Albarqawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Dermatologist's Guide to Nonsurgical Rejuvenation of the Neck and Jawline.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Facial Overfilled Syndrome: A Narrative Clinical Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient satisfaction following treatment with micro-focused ultrasound with visualization: A retrospective cross-sectional study.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abrar BukhariDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asem ShadidDepartment of Dermatology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7422-781X
Abdullah Al-OmairDepartment of Dermatology, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ashjan AlheggiDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Eman Abdulaziz AlmukhadebDermatology Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Salma Y AlbarqawiDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been increased public interest in noninvasive skin tightening procedures that produce the best possible cosmetic outcomes. Micro-focused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a secure, efficient method of treating skin laxity approved by the FDA. Few studies have assessed patient satisfaction following MFU-V. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2022 and 2023. After obtaining the author's permission, a previously examined and published questionnaire was used to contact all participants (n = 98) who had received MFU-V therapy in a private clinic in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2016 and 2020 via phone interview.

resultsAll 98 patients undergoing MFU-V were female. About two-thirds indicated they were satisfied or very satisfied with the results. Those receiving treatment around the eye and submentum reported lower satisfaction levels than those receiving therapy in other regions. The number of treatment locations and satisfaction were positively correlated. Patients treated by consultants rather than laser experts reported much higher satisfaction levels. Satisfaction and the amount of time for improvement to occur following treatment were correlated statistically. Pain and tingling were the most frequent adverse effects the respondents reported, followed by skin redness and swelling; however, adverse effects were not connected with satisfaction. Cost (78.6%) was cited as the main deterrent to seeking treatment again.

conclusionMFU-V, an FDA-approved procedure, has proven effective and safe for treating facial and neck skin laxity. When patients are carefully selected and physicians properly trained, higher satisfaction is achieved.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionSkin AgingUltrasonic TherapyAdultCosmetic TechniquesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultface and neck laxitymicro‐focused ultrasoundmicro‐focused ultrasound with visualization (mfu‐v)ultherapy

Identifiers

PMID39121005
PMCPMC11314364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.