Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120996›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Revealing unexpected complex encoding but simple decoding mechanisms in motor cortex via separating behaviorally relevant neural signals.

Yangang Li, Xinyun Zhu, Yu Qi, Yueming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yangang LiQiushi Academy for Advanced Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7271-2993
Xinyun ZhuQiushi Academy for Advanced Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3820-4761
Yu QiNanhu Brain-Computer Interface Institute, Hangzhou, China.
Yueming WangQiushi Academy for Advanced Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-0722

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang no. 2022C03011National Natural Science Foundation of China no. 62336007Starry Night Science Fund of Zhejiang University Shanghai Institute for Advanced Study SN-ZJU-SIAS-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In motor cortex, behaviorally relevant neural responses are entangled with irrelevant signals, which complicates the study of encoding and decoding mechanisms. It remains unclear whether behaviorally irrelevant signals could conceal some critical truth. One solution is to accurately separate behaviorally relevant and irrelevant signals at both single-neuron and single-trial levels, but this approach remains elusive due to the unknown ground truth of behaviorally relevant signals. Therefore, we propose a framework to define, extract, and validate behaviorally relevant signals. Analyzing separated signals in three monkeys performing different reaching tasks, we found neural responses previously considered to contain little information actually encode rich behavioral information in complex nonlinear ways. These responses are critical for neuronal redundancy and reveal movement behaviors occupy a higher-dimensional neural space than previously expected. Surprisingly, when incorporating often-ignored neural dimensions, behaviorally relevant signals can be decoded linearly with comparable performance to nonlinear decoding, suggesting linear readout may be performed in motor cortex. Our findings prompt that separating behaviorally relevant signals may help uncover more hidden cortical mechanisms.

Indexed as

Macaca mulattaMotor CortexNeuronsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMaleMovementneural decodingneural encodingneural signal separationneurosciencerhesus macaque

Identifiers

PMID39120996
PMCPMC11315449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.