Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120861›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2025

The Job Demands and Accommodation Planning Tool (JDAPT): A Nine-Month Evaluation of Use, Changes in Self-efficacy, Presenteeism, and Absenteeism in Workers with Chronic and Episodic Disabilities.

Monique A M Gignac, Julie Bowring, Lahmea Navaratnerajah, Ron Saunders, Arif Jetha, Aaron Thompson, William S Shaw, Renee-Louise Franche, Dwayne Van Eerd, Emma Irvin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Monique A M GignacInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada. mgignac@iwh.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-3274
Julie BowringInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Lahmea NavaratnerajahInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2673-0752
Ron SaundersInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Arif JethaInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0322-7027
Aaron ThompsonWorkplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB), Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-6330
William S ShawDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-6415
Renee-Louise FrancheSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, USA.
Dwayne Van EerdInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5672-0168
Emma IrvinInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Emile TompaInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-3853
Joy C MacdermidSchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-7379
Peter M SmithInstitute for Work & Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8286-4563

Funding

CIHR 890-2016-3002Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 890-2016-3002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnhancing workplace communication and support processes to enable individuals living with disabilities to sustain employment and return to work is a priority for workers, employers, and community stakeholders. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new resource that addresses support challenges, the Job Demands and Accommodation Planning Tool (JDAPT), and assess its use, relevance, and outcomes over a nine-month follow-up period.

methodsWorkers with physical and mental health/cognitive conditions causing limitations at work were recruited using purposive sampling. Online surveys were administered at baseline (prior to using the JDAPT), and at three and nine months post-baseline. Information was collected on demographics (e.g., age, gender) and work characteristics (e.g., job sector, organization size). Outcomes included assessing JDAPT use and relevance, and changes in self-efficacy, work productivity difficulties, employment concerns, difficulties with job demands, and absenteeism.

resultsBaseline participants were 269 workers (66% women; mean age 41 years) of whom 188 (69.9%) completed all three waves of data collection. Many workers reported using JDAPT strategies at and outside of work, and held positive perceptions of the tool's usability, relevance, and helpfulness. There were significant improvements (Time 1-2; Time 1-3) in self-efficacy, perceived work productivity, and absenteeism with moderate to large effect sizes in self-efficacy and productivity (0.46 to 0.78). Findings were consistent across gender, age, health condition, and work context variables.

conclusionsThe JDAPT can enhance support provision and provide greater transparency and consistency to workplace disability practices, which is critical to creating more inclusive and accessible employment opportunities.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismPersons with DisabilitiesPresenteeismSelf EfficacyAdultEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReturn to WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceAccommodationsDisabilityDisclosureEmploymentEvaluationInterventionResourcesSupport

Identifiers

PMID39120861
PMCPMC12360972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.