Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120845›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2024

Robotic pyelolithotomy for treating large renal stone disease: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Li Wang, Si-Yu Chen, Fan-Qi Wu, Shun Wan, Kun-Peng Li, Xiao-Ran Li

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Robot-Assisted Pyelolithotomy in Pelvic Kidney.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li Wang *Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Si-Yu Chen *Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Fan-Qi WuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Shun WanDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Kun-Peng LiDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Xiao-Ran LiDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China. lixiaoran05@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic pyelolithotomy continues to gain attention as an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for managing complex renal stones. We performed a single-arm meta-analysis and systematically searched the English-language literature published in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to June 2024. The risk of non-randomized bias was assessed using ROBINS-I, and the quality of the literature was assessed using MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies). Merger parameters were calculated using Stata16/SE under a random-effects model. Five non-comparative single-arm studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed that the operative time for robotic pyelolithotomy was 168.10 min (95% CI 133.63, 202.56). The hospital stay was 2.63 days (95% CI 0.96, 4.29), and blood loss was 44.13 ml (95% CI 19.76, 68.51). The stone clearance rate was 87% (95% CI 79-93%). The incidence of minor postoperative complications (Clavien grade I-II) was 23.7% (95% CI 13.4-35.8%), and the incidence of major complications (Clavien grade ≥ III) was 7% (95% CI 0.3-20.7%).The safety and efficacy of robotic pyelolithotomy in treating complex renal stones are acceptable, but future large prospective cohort studies are needed to validate the treatment.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiOperative TimeRobotic Surgical ProceduresBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansKidney PelvisLength of StayMaleNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeDaVinciKidney stonesMeta-analysisRobotic pyelolithotomyStaghorn calculi

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.