ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025
Outcomes of a Virtual 10-Week COVID-19 and Psychosis Program in an HMO: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual clinical services became the primary treatment modality in a large U.S. HMO psychiatry department during the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed methods quality improvement project was developed to address psychosis, severe anxiety, and stressors unique to COVID-19 and sheltering in place. The purpose was to determine if a virtual 10-week pilot program combining psychoeducation, skills-based training, experiential exercises using third-wave CBT, and process questions would decrease symptoms and hospitalization rates and improve quality of life. Pre- and postmeasure scores on pandemic-related stress (the PRSF), perceived stress (PSS), and general patient health (PHQ-9) were gathered from five patients in the Department of Psychiatry at Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, California. Qualitative interviews explored patients' perceptions of program benefits. Mean, median, and range on the pre- and postprogram assessments and paired samples t tests for means were calculated. Quantitative results were not statistically significant: p = 0.32 (Revised PRSF), p = 0.34 (PSS), p = 0.94 (PHQ-9). In interviews, most participants reported a decrease in pandemic-related stress. Half reported a decrease in general perceived stress. Half reported no change. Self-assessment reflected perceptions of benefits from this 10-week program, using words such as useful and important. The virtual program helped relieve pandemic-related stress and improved overall quality of life. The results show promise for expanding the program to other hospitals providing services for this diagnostic population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39120778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.