ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Calibration of Aseptic Loosening Simulation for Coatings Osteoinductive Effect.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Preclinical Approach to 3D-Printed Osseointegration Prosthesis: Improving Functional Outcomes and Reducing Complications in Residual Limb Reconstruction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The risk of aseptic loosening in cementless hip stems can be reduced by improving osseointegration with osteoinductive coatings favoring long-term implant stability. Osseointegration is usually evaluated in vivo studies, which, however, do not reproduce the mechanically driven adaptation process. This study aims to develop an in silico model to predict implant osseointegration and the effect of induced micromotion on long-term stability, including a calibration of the material osteoinductivity with conventional in vivo studies. A Finite Element model of the tibia implanted with pins was generated, exploiting bone-to-implant contact measures of cylindrical titanium alloys implanted in rabbits' tibiae. The evolution of the contact status between bone and implant was modeled using a finite state machine, which updated the contact state at each iteration based on relative micromotion, shear and tensile stresses, and bone-to-implant distance. The model was calibrated with in vivo data by identifying the maximum bridgeable gap. Afterward, a push-out test was simulated to predict the axial load that caused the macroscopic mobilization of the pin. The bone-implant bridgeable gap ranged between 50 μm and 80 μm. Predicted push-out strength ranged from 19 N to 21 N (5.4 MPa-3.4 MPa) depending on final bone-to-implant contact. Push-out strength agrees with experimental measurements from a previous animal study (4 ± 1 MPa), carried out using the same implant material, coated, or uncoated. This method can partially replace in vivo studies and predict the long-term stability of cementless hip stems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.