Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120769›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics to Compare Two Repair Techniques for Mitral Valve Prolapse.

Lorenzo Bennati, Giovanni Puppini, Vincenzo Giambruno, Giovanni Battista Luciani, Christian Vergara

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorenzo BennatiDepartment of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Obstetrics/Gynecology, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, Verona, 37134, Italy.
Giovanni PuppiniDepartment of Radiology, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, 37126, Italy.
Vincenzo GiambrunoDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Obstetrics/Gynecology, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, 37126, Italy.
Giovanni Battista LucianiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Obstetrics/Gynecology, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, 37126, Italy.
Christian VergaraLaBS, Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, 20133, Italy. christian.vergara@polimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9872-5410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe treatment of mitral valve prolapse involves two distinct repair techniques: chordal replacement (Neochordae technique) and leaflet resection (Resection technique). However, there is still a debate in the literature about which is the optimal one. In this context, we performed an image-based computational fluid dynamic study to evaluate blood dynamics in the two surgical techniques.

methodsWe considered a healthy subject (H) and two patients (N and R) who underwent surgery for prolapse of the posterior leaflet and were operated with the Neochordae and Resection technique, respectively. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was employed with prescribed motion of the entire left heart coming from cine-MRI images, with a Large Eddy Simulation model to describe the transition to turbulence and a resistive method for managing valve dynamics. We created three different virtual scenarios where the operated mitral valves were inserted in the same left heart geometry of the healthy subject to study the differences attributed only to the two techniques.

resultsWe compared the three scenarios by quantitatively analyzing ventricular velocity patterns and pressures, transition to turbulence, and the ventricle ability to prevent thrombi formation. From these results, we found that the operative techniques affected the ventricular blood dynamics in different ways, with variations attributed to the reduced mobility of the Resection posterior leaflet. Specifically, the Resection technique resulted in turbulent forces, related with the risk of hemolysis formation, up to 640 Pa, while the other two scenarios exhibited a maximum of 240 Pa. Moreover, in correspondence of the ventricular apex, the Resection technique reduced the areas with low velocity to 15%, whereas the healthy case and the Neochordae case maintained these areas at 30 and 48%, respectively. Our findings suggest that the Neochordae technique developed a more physiological flow with respect to the Resection technique.

conclusionResection technique gives rise to a different direction of the mitral jet during diastole increasing the ability to washout the ventricular apex preventing from thrombi formation, but at the same time it promotes turbulence formation that is associated with ventricular effort and risk of hemolysis.

Indexed as

HydrodynamicsMitral Valve ProlapseComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitral ValveModels, CardiovascularComputational fluid dynamicsHemolysisMitral valve prolapseNeochordae techniqueResection techniqueTurbulence

Identifiers

PMID39120769
PMCPMC11561035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.