Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120752›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

Deep learning-based pseudo-CT synthesis from zero echo time MR sequences of the pelvis.

Jonas M Getzmann, Eva Deininger-Czermak, Savvas Melissanidis, Falko Ensle, Sandeep S Kaushik, Florian Wiesinger, Cristina Cozzini, Luca M Sconfienza, Roman Guggenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonas M GetzmannInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland. jonas.getzmann@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1625-8826
Eva Deininger-CzermakInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
Savvas MelissanidisInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
Falko EnsleInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
Sandeep S KaushikGE HealthCare, Oskar-Schlemmer-Strasse 11, Munich, Germany.
Florian WiesingerGE HealthCare, Oskar-Schlemmer-Strasse 11, Munich, Germany.
Cristina CozziniGE HealthCare, Oskar-Schlemmer-Strasse 11, Munich, Germany.
Luca M SconfienzaUnit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Roman GuggenbergerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo generate pseudo-CT (pCT) images of the pelvis from zero echo time (ZTE) MR sequences and compare them to conventional CT.

methodsNinety-one patients were prospectively scanned with CT and MRI including ZTE sequences of the pelvis. Eleven ZTE image volumes were excluded due to implants and severe B1 field inhomogeneity. Out of the 80 data sets, 60 were used to train and update a deep learning (DL) model for pCT image synthesis from ZTE sequences while the remaining 20 cases were selected as an evaluation cohort. CT and pCT images were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by two readers.

resultsMean pCT ratings of qualitative parameters were good to perfect (2-3 on a 4-point scale). Overall intermodality agreement between CT and pCT was good (ICC = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.90); p < 0.001) with excellent interreader agreements for pCT (ICC = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93); p < 0.001). Most geometrical measurements did not show any significant difference between CT and pCT measurements (p > 0.05) with the exception of transverse pelvic diameter measurements and lateral center-edge angle measurements (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Image quality and tissue differentiation in CT and pCT were similar without significant differences between CT and pCT CNRs (all p > 0.05).

conclusionsUsing a DL-based algorithm, it is possible to synthesize pCT images of the pelvis from ZTE sequences. The pCT images showed high bone depiction quality and accurate geometrical measurements compared to conventional CT. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: pCT images generated from MR sequences allow for high accuracy in evaluating bone without the need for radiation exposure. Radiological applications are broad and include assessment of inflammatory and degenerative bone disease or preoperative planning studies. KEY POINTS: pCT, based on DL-reconstructed ZTE MR images, may be comparable with true CT images. Overall, the intermodality agreement between CT and pCT was good with excellent interreader agreements for pCT. Geometrical measurements and tissue differentiation were similar in CT and pCT images.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingSynthetic computed tomographyZero echo time

Identifiers

PMID39120752
PMCPMC11315823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.