ArticleCell and tissue research2024
Involvement of vimentin- and BLBP-positive glial cells and their MMP expression in axonal regeneration after spinal cord transection in goldfish.
Article in Cell and tissue research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomaterial Engineering for Spatiotemporal Regulation of Exosome Functions: From Design Principles to Key Applications in Regenerative Medicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeting glial scar formation for spinal cord injury: mechanisms, strategies, and research progress review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Novel nerve regeneration assessment method using adult zebrafish with crush spinal cord injury.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In goldfish, spinal cord injury triggers the formation of a fibrous scar at the injury site. Regenerating axons are able to penetrate the scar tissue, resulting in the recovery of motor function. Previous findings suggested that regenerating axons enter the scar through tubular structures surrounded by glial elements with laminin-positive basement membranes and that glial processes expressing glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with axonal regeneration. How glia contribute to promoting axonal regeneration, however, is unknown. Here, we revealed that glial processes expressing vimentin or brain lipid-binding protein (BLBP) also enter the fibrous scar after spinal cord injury in goldfish. Vimentin-positive glial processes were more numerous than GFAP- or BLBP-positive glial processes in the scar tissue. Regenerating axons in the scar tissue were more closely associated with vimentin-positive glial processes than GFAP-positive glial processes. Vimentin-positive glial processes co-expressed matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14. Our findings suggest that vimentin-positive glial processes closely associate with regenerating axons through tubular structures entering the scar after spinal cord injury in goldfish. In intact spinal cord, ependymo-radial glial cell bodies express BLBP and their radial processes express vimentin, suggesting that vimentin-positive glial processes derive from migrating ependymo-radial glial cells. MMP-14 expressed in vimentin-positive glial cells and their processes might provide a beneficial environment for axonal regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39120736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.