Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120665›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

The use of Dose Management Systems in Europe: Results of an ESR EuroSafe Imaging Questionnaire.

Reinhard Loose, Eliseo Vaño, Josefin Ammon, Jonas Andersson, Hugues Brat, Boris Brkljacic, Katrina Caikovska, Riccardo Corridori, John Damilakis, Timo De Bondt and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Reinhard LooseInstitute of Medical Physics, Paracelsus Medical School, Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Eliseo VañoRadiology Department, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Josefin AmmonInstitute of Medical Physics, Paracelsus Medical School, Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Jonas AnderssonDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Radiation Physics, Umeå University, SE-091 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Hugues BratSwiss Imaging Network, Sion, Switzerland.
Boris BrkljacicUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, UH Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia.
Katrina CaikovskaChildren's Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Riccardo CorridoriEuropean Coordination Committee of the Radiological, Electromedical and Healthcare IT Enterprises (COCIR), Brussels, Belgium.
John DamilakisUniversity of Crete, School of Medicine, Iraklion, Crete, Greece.
Timo De BondtDepartment of Medical Physics, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Guy FrijaParis Cité University, Paris, France.
Claudio GranataDepartment of Pediatric Radiology Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo"-Trieste (I), Trieste, Italy.
Christoph HoeschenOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Elmar KotterDepartment of Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ivana KralikUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, UH Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jonathan McNultySchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Graciano PauloHealth and Technology Research Center, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Coimbra, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Virginia TsapakiKonstantopoulio General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
European Society of Radiology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dose management systems (DMS) are an essential tool for quality assurance and optimising patient radiation exposure. For radiologists and medical physicists, they are important for managing many radiation protection tasks. In addition, they help fulfil the requirements of Directive 2013/59/EURATOM regarding the electronic transmission of dosimetric data and the detection of unintended patient exposures. The EuroSafe Imaging Clinical Dosimetry and Dose Management Working Group launched a questionnaire on the use of DMS in European member states and analysed the results in terms of modalities, frequency of radiological procedures, involvement of medical physics experts (MPEs), legal requirements, and local issues (support by information technology (IT), modality interfaces, protocol mapping, clinical workflow, and associated costs). CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Despite the great advantages of dose management systems for optimising radiation protection, distribution remains insufficient. This questionnaire shows that reasons include: a lack of DICOM interfaces, insufficient harmonisation of procedure names, lack of medical physicist and IT support, and costs. KEY POINTS: Quantitative radiation dose information is essential for justification and optimisation in medical imaging. Guidelines are required to ensure radiation dose management systems quality and for acceptance testing. Verifying dose data management is crucial before dose management systems clinical implementation. Medical physics experts are professionals who have important responsibilities for the proper management of dose monitoring.

Indexed as

Computer applications-generalDiagnostic procedureDose managementQuality assuranceRadioprotection

Identifiers

PMID39120665
PMCPMC11315857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.