ReviewThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2025
A critical review of the use of R
Review in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ex ante evaluation of risk adjustment models for prospective provider payment: a conceptual framework and empirical application.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Differentiation of morbidity measurement in Germany's morbidity-based risk adjustment depending on general practitioner and specialist treatment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Model to Improve Risk Adjustment Accuracy in Medicare.Health services research · 2026Article
- Pharmacy cost groups for the German morbidity-based risk compensation scheme.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Selecting risk adjusters with penalized regression and expert judgment: evidence from Colombia.Health economics review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nearly all empirical studies that estimate the coefficients of a risk equalization formula present the value of the statistical measure R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.